Tea Leaves From SCOTUS Arguments in Guns and Drugs Case

Tea Leaves From SCOTUS Arguments in Guns and Drugs Case

Court Cases
2A Win

Summary

The article analyzes oral arguments from the Supreme Court case U.S. v. Hemani, which challenges Section 922(g)(3)'s prohibition on gun possession for 'unlawful' drug users. The author predicts a majority of justices will rule in favor of defendant Ali Danial Hemani, affirming his Second Amendment rights, potentially with a unique judicial alignment.

Read Full Article at Bearing Arms

Tags

supreme-court
court-cases
second-amendment
federal-law
drug-users
922g3

Related Articles