Gun Control Groups Mum After Hemani Oral Arguments

Gun Control Groups Mum After Hemani Oral Arguments

Court Cases
2A Loss

Summary

The Supreme Court case *U.S. v. Hemani* has undergone oral arguments, with potential major implications for millions of Americans who own firearms and use marijuana. Gun control groups like Brady and Everytown for Gun Safety submitted amicus briefs supporting the federal government's position that Section 922(g)(3) should prohibit all 'unlawful' drug users from owning firearms.

Read Full Article at Bearing Arms

Tags

supreme-court
federal-law
gun-rights
narcotics
prohibition
brady
everytown
due-process

Related Articles