This video, presented by attorney Anthony Miranda, a staff attorney with the Firearms Policy Coalition, details a significant legal victory against the ATF's new rule on frames and receivers. The case, Vanderstok v Garland, saw the Northern District of Texas grant a preliminary injunction, finding the ATF's new definition facially unlawful. The segment highlights the successful intervention of Black Hawk Manufacturing (80% Arms) as a plaintiff and their subsequent motion for a preliminary injunction, arguing the rule would cause irreparable economic harm.
This video provides an expert legal analysis from Anthony Miranda, a licensed attorney specializing in Second Amendment rights, regarding a significant federal court ruling against the ATF. The court found the ATF's new rule on regulating frames and receivers to be facially unlawful, granting a limited preliminary injunction. The ruling impacts the classification and regulation of 80% receivers, potentially affecting manufacturers and consumers nationwide.
You've reached the end! 2 videos loaded.
Gun Laws by State
Read firearms regulations for all 50 states + D.C.
Find Gun Dealers
Search licensed FFL dealers near you.
