Videos tagged with Consumer Boycott

This YouTube video analyzes why the MAGA base's political stance and actions can create apprehension and concern among various corporations. It explores the potential impact of this base on corporate decision-making, public relations, and business strategies, likely delving into issues of consumer boycotts, employee activism, and political pressure.

This video discusses the controversy surrounding Rare Breed Triggers' lawsuit against Hoffman Tactical, filed on Christmas Eve. The speaker, representing the 'Combat Llama Herd,' highlights the overwhelmingly negative reaction from the online gun community, with many commenters expressing intent to boycott Rare Breed Triggers and support Hoffman Tactical. The sentiment suggests that Rare Breed Triggers' actions are viewed as unethical and detrimental to the firearms community.

This video analyzes the controversy surrounding Sons of Liberty Gun Works (SOLGW) following their appearance on the TTPOA podcast. Ben Stoeger, a professional competition shooter, discusses the intense backlash, including consumer boycotts and FFLs refusing to stock SOLGW products. The conflict arises from a perceived disconnect between SOLGW's view of firearms as a non-political product and a significant customer base that views gun ownership as a core political identity.

This video discusses consumer boycotts of firearm manufacturers and retailers, with the host and viewers sharing reasons for their purchasing decisions. Key brands mentioned for boycotts include Springfield Armory due to past actions of its owner, Kel-Tec for perceived poor quality, Cheaper Than Dirt for price gouging after Sandy Hook, and Lone Wolf for refusing to ship parts to certain states. The discussion highlights that personal purchasing choices are a valid form of consumer feedback.

This video explains the speaker's rationale for boycotting Springfield Armory, stemming from an alleged past action where the company lobbied for legislation that would harm competitors while seeking exemption for themselves. The speaker contrasts this with Bill Ruger's actions, arguing Ruger sought to prevent worse outcomes. The video emphasizes that corporations prioritize profit and that consumers must remain vigilant and hold companies accountable for actions detrimental to the Second Amendment and the firearms community.

This video discusses Liberty Safe's controversial decision, drawing a parallel to the "Bud Lighted" situation, implying a perceived betrayal of their customer base or core values. The creator encourages viewers to subscribe and links to various playlists covering handgun and long gun reviews, Second Amendment advocacy, gear reviews, and range tests. The video also provides social media links for Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.

This video discusses the ethical implications of companies cooperating with law enforcement requests for access to safes, using Liberty Safes as a primary example. The speaker argues that companies should prioritize constitutional principles over compliance with potentially overreaching government requests. The discussion explores when and how a brand that has made a 'misstep' can regain consumer trust, drawing parallels to other companies like Ruger and the NRA.

Langley Outdoors Academy discusses Discover Card's upcoming implementation of specific merchant category codes for firearms and ammunition purchases, effective April. This move, influenced by political pressure and 'woke' banks, will allow for tracking of these transactions. The video encourages Discover cardholders to cancel their cards in protest of potential privacy violations and the tracking of Second Amendment-related purchases, noting Visa, Mastercard, and American Express have not yet committed to similar codes.

Discover Card is implementing a new merchant code for FFLs to track firearm and accessory purchases. This move is not about creating a registry but rather to assess the financial impact of gun sales on their business. The speaker argues this allows Discover to potentially ban gun purchases to appeal to anti-gun demographics, urging consumers to boycott if such policies are enacted.

This video discusses the growing impact of consumer and voter action on corporate political stances, particularly concerning the Second Amendment and 'woke' ideologies. It highlights how collective action, like boycotting or voting with dollars, has led to significant financial repercussions for corporations that oppose conservative viewpoints, citing examples like Disney and JP Morgan. The speaker emphasizes that patriots are making a tangible difference by holding these corporations accountable.

This video discusses the ethical considerations of purchasing firearms from retailers with known affiliations to extremist groups. The speaker highlights a specific instance involving DE Guns.net and a Springfield Hellcat deal posted on Reddit, where a manager was identified as a neo-Nazi leader. The video prompts viewers to consider whether the source of a firearm purchase matters, even when presented with a good deal.

This video discusses the controversy surrounding Springfield Armory's alleged support for anti-gun legislation in Illinois in 2017, which included carve-outs for the company. Despite Springfield's claims of ignorance, evidence suggests significant donations to an association that pushed the bill. The video contrasts this with the 2019 launch of the Hellcat, where a coordinated influencer campaign aimed to generate positive buzz, highlighting a perceived disconnect between corporate actions and consumer trust.