A DC Circuit Court of Appeals decision upheld the district's ban on firearm purchases for individuals under 21, citing historical tradition and contract law precedents. The ruling asserts that if purchasing firearms is restricted for those aged 18-20, then possessing and carrying them is also constitutionally permissible to restrict. This decision is seen as a significant blow to Second Amendment rights for young adults, despite their ability to engage in other adult activities like voting and entering contracts.
This video from the Shawn Ryan Show features Erik Bethel recounting a high-pressure negotiation experience in China. Bethel, a former U.S. Representative to the World Bank, describes how he was presented with a contract that had a 40% price increase at the last minute. He refused to sign under duress and successfully negotiated the original terms by walking away, demonstrating a key negotiation tactic.
This video analyzes the 11th Circuit's decision in NRA v. Bondi, arguing it misinterprets historical precedent regarding firearm acquisition rights for 18-20 year olds. Constitutional attorney Mark Smith, referencing scholar Alan Beck, explains how the court's reliance on historical contract law for minors fails to account for the 'necessities' exception, particularly concerning firearms for militia service and self-defense. The analysis highlights that even if historical restrictions on minors' contracts existed, they are inapplicable today as 18-20 year olds are considered full adults.
You've reached the end! 4 videos loaded.
Gun Laws by State
Read firearms regulations for all 50 states + D.C.
Find Gun Dealers
Search licensed FFL dealers near you.
