The video discusses the ongoing legal challenge, Anderson v. Raul, against Illinois's outright ban on suppressor possession. It highlights the state's argument that suppressors are not 'arms' under the Second Amendment, contrasting this with federal law (NFA) and common use. The plaintiffs argue suppressors are neither dangerous nor unusual, citing widespread ownership and their benefits for hearing protection, public courtesy, training, and self-defense, with minimal criminal use.
You've reached the end! 1 videos loaded.
Gun Laws by State
Read firearms regulations for all 50 states + D.C.
Find Gun Dealers
Search licensed FFL dealers near you.
