Videos tagged with Felon Disarmament

This interview with legal scholar Jamie McWilliam delves into two critical Second Amendment issues: the 'common use' standard for firearm regulation post-Bruin and the 'dangerousness' standard for disarming individuals. McWilliam explains the historical origins and legal interpretations of 'common use' stemming from US v. Miller and Heller, and its application in the Bruin framework. He also analyzes the 'dangerousness' standard for firearm prohibitions, discussing its historical basis and its relevance to modern laws like felon disarmament, referencing cases such as Range v. Garland and US v. Rahimi.

This video, presented by William Kirk of Washington Gun Law, details the critical legal case of Vincent v. Garland, which challenges the constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) as it pertains to non-violent felons. The discussion highlights the ongoing circuit split and the potential for the Supreme Court to clarify whether permanent disarmament of citizens with non-violent felony convictions violates the Second Amendment, especially in light of the Bruen decision. The video also promotes 'Right to Bear' legal defense services.

This video provides an expert analysis of the Supreme Court case Range v. Garland, focusing on its potential to reshape Second Amendment jurisprudence. It details how the Third Circuit's en banc ruling challenged the federal statute 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) as applied to individuals with non-violent misdemeanor offenses, emphasizing the 'history and tradition' test derived from the Bruen decision. The discussion highlights the government's arguments for Supreme Court review and the potential implications for future Second Amendment challenges.