A Ninth Circuit ruling in U.S. v. Duarte declared that non-violent felons do not permanently lose their Second Amendment rights under federal law, applying the Bruen standard. The court found the government failed to provide historical analogues justifying lifetime bans for such individuals. This decision could influence the Supreme Court's ruling in U.S. v. Rahimi and redefines 'the people' in the context of the Second Amendment.
This expert-level analysis, presented by Mark W. Smith, a constitutional attorney and author, dissects the legal framework for Second Amendment cases post-Bruen and Heller. It emphasizes the Supreme Court's requirement to analyze gun rights through text and history, debunking anti-gun arguments that pervert historical context to justify modern restrictions. The content highlights the necessity of relying on actual founding-era laws rather than speculative theories.
This video analyzes a Slate article and the efforts of "Moms Demand Action" volunteers to find historical gun control laws from the Founding Era. Constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith argues that their search is a "fool's errand" and that they are unlikely to find the historical tradition they are seeking. The discussion touches on the relevance of the 19th century and mentions John Roberts' opinion in Espinoza. The content is presented by The Four Boxes Diner, which focuses on Second Amendment news and analysis.
You've reached the end! 3 videos loaded.
Gun Laws by State
Read firearms regulations for all 50 states + D.C.
Find Gun Dealers
Search licensed FFL dealers near you.