Congresswoman Victoria Spartz critically questions ATF Director Steve D'Antuono regarding the agency's broad redefinition of what constitutes 'engaging in the business of dealing firearms predominantly for profit.' The discussion highlights concerns that the new regulations, detailed in extensive documentation, are overly vague and could inadvertently criminalize ordinary citizens who occasionally sell firearms, potentially leading to unintended consequences and a chilling effect on Second Amendment rights. The ATF's interpretation is presented as implementing Congressional law, but the vagueness of the definitions is a central point of contention.
The video discusses the Supreme Court's ruling in New York Rifle and Pistol Club v. Bruin, highlighting a single sentence from Justice Clarence Thomas. This sentence mandates that Second Amendment interpretations must consider historical context, specifically the restrictions present in 1791 when the amendment was ratified. The speaker argues this implies all current gun laws are unconstitutional due to the lack of historical restrictions.
You've reached the end! 2 videos loaded.
Gun Laws by State
Read firearms regulations for all 50 states + D.C.
Find Gun Dealers
Search licensed FFL dealers near you.
