Videos tagged with Journalism Ethics

This video alleges that CNN is engaging in 'cherry picking' of data for a 'propaganda push,' claiming they have omitted 75% of relevant information. The video references several social media posts from X (formerly Twitter) that appear to support this claim by presenting data points or analysis that the uploader believes CNN has ignored. The content focuses on media criticism and the perceived manipulation of information by a major news outlet.

This video addresses accusations made by Jimmy Dore against a photographer, claiming he was a "second shooter" at an event involving Charlie Kirk. The photographer, from Paramount Tactical, clarifies his actual position and actions during the event, detailing the severe personal impact of these conspiracy theories, including doxing threats. The content highlights the dangers of misinformation and its real-world consequences.

This preview discusses the lack of FBI transparency in the Jeffrey Epstein case, with Jon Delaney explaining how the classification system is allegedly used by the 'deep state' to hide corruption and illegal activities. The conversation touches on media bias, propaganda, and the importance of independent journalism in the face of censorship and potential foreign influence.

This podcast episode features a discussion on various firearms and related topics. The host, The Yankee Marshal, engages with viewers on subjects ranging from specific handgun models like the FN 510 Tactical and Walther P99 to rifle platforms such as Henry Repeating Arms. The conversation also touches upon firearm accessories like red dot sights, common firearm issues like 1911 slide stop dings, and historical firearms like the M1897 Trench Gun. Legal and political commentary on gun control and the role of journalists is also present, alongside discussions about supporting the channel through merchandise and Patreon.

The YouTube video title, "How to Bribe a Reviewer," and the description, "This doesn't matter anymore," strongly suggest a meta-commentary on the integrity of product reviews, potentially within the firearms community. Given the common trope of "bribing" for positive reviews, this video likely discusses or satirizes the ethics of reviewer compensation and its impact on perceived objectivity. The content's relevance to firearms enthusiasts is questionable without further context, but it could touch upon the reviewer landscape for firearms or related gear.

This video provides an update on the Kyle Rittenhouse trial, focusing on the testimony of a key prosecution witness who was shot during the incident. The speaker analyzes the witness's statements, highlighting inconsistencies and admissions that appear to support Rittenhouse's self-defense claim. The commentary also criticizes media coverage of the trial, suggesting a biased narrative that ignores crucial evidence. The speaker predicts Rittenhouse will be acquitted of the major charges.

This video, titled 'Ant’s Rants - Yellow Journalism At It's Finest,' critiques media reporting, particularly concerning a child's incident. The description highlights concerns about media sensationalism and potential misrepresentation of events, using the term 'plunge' to question the narrative. The host, Anthony Colandro of Gun For Hire, expresses frustration with what he perceives as biased reporting and a failure to identify responsible parties, implying that the media is protecting criminals at public expense. The video also promotes various Gun For Hire resources including their website, academy, radio show, and social media channels, alongside information on obtaining firearm permits in NJ/NY and a 'Crime Proof Book'.

This video features Grant Stinchfield critiquing The New York Times for what he describes as anti-gun propaganda. He alleges the newspaper employs tactics like lying by omission, taking comments out of context, and fabricating information to mislead its readers. The description suggests that Americans are losing trust in traditional media for truth and are instead becoming self-reliant in addressing their safety concerns in a "hostile world."

This video features Dana Loesch discussing the perceived bias of The New York Times with Grant Stinchfield. Loesch anticipates criticism from the Times regarding factual corrections, suggesting they view such fact-checking as an act of aggression. The discussion centers on the media's handling of information and potential bias, particularly in relation to topics that may be of interest to firearm owners and Second Amendment advocates.

This video critically analyzes media coverage of firearms organizations, specifically the NRA and its spokesperson Dana Loesch. The description alleges that major media outlets like The New York Times, Washington Post, and CNN, through an organization called Digital Content Next, are pushing a narrative to discredit the NRA. The video claims these outlets are protecting Antifa, which it describes as a violent group, while attacking the NRA, portraying it as a courageous defender against the 'violent left.' The core argument is that the media is biased against the NRA and gun rights.

This video discusses mainstream media's perceived misplaced priorities during a disaster, specifically Hurricane Harvey. The host, Grant Stinchfield, criticizes outlets like the Washington Post and New York Times for focusing on First Lady Melania Trump's fashion choices instead of the ongoing crisis and recovery efforts. The video argues that such media attention is embarrassing and distracts from the important work of helping those affected.

This episode of Gun Talk Radio discusses a legal victory for the Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) in Seattle regarding a "gun violence tax." Journalist Dave Workman details how the city's tax was intended to drive gun stores out of business and circumvent state preemption laws. The lawsuit, Workman v. City of Seattle, successfully compelled the city to release tax revenue data, revealing significantly lower collection than projected. The discussion highlights the importance of public access to information and the potential for dangerous legal precedents.