Videos tagged with Judge Van Dyk

This video features a dissenting judge's video opinion on the Ninth Circuit's ruling regarding magazine capacity bans. Judge Van Dyk uses a handgun and its components, including iron sights and a red dot optic, to illustrate his argument that the legal distinction between an 'arm' and an 'accessory' is flawed and inconsistent with firearm functionality. He contends that if high-capacity magazines can be banned as accessories, then other functional parts like sights could also be deemed unprotected, undermining Second Amendment rights.