Videos tagged with Judicial Branch

This video discusses a significant court ruling by the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit in the case of Grundman v. Trump. The ruling supports the unitary executive theory, asserting that the President holds ultimate executive power under Article II of the Constitution, superseding congressional statutes that attempt to restrict the President's removal authority over executive branch officials. This decision is presented as a victory against the 'deep state' and administrative agencies.

This video translates the Supreme Court's decision in Garland v. Cargill regarding bump stocks into plain English. It explains that the executive branch overstepped its authority by banning bump stocks, as this power lies with the legislature. The ruling clarifies that bump stocks do not meet the legal definition of a machine gun because they do not fire more than one shot by a single function of the trigger.

This video explains the significance of recent court victories concerning bump stocks and pistol braces, emphasizing that these rulings primarily address the ATF overstepping its authority rather than Second Amendment rights directly. The speaker highlights the importance of these cases in reining in the 'administrative state' and restoring the balance of power among the three branches of government.

This video delves into the critical Supreme Court case regarding presidential immunity for Donald Trump's actions as president, particularly concerning January 6th. It explores the constitutional arguments surrounding the separation of powers, the authority of special prosecutors, and the distinction between acts that are inherently wrong (malam in se) versus those that are wrong because they are prohibited (malam prohibitum). The analysis highlights potential outcomes, including dismissal of charges based on prosecutorial authority or a nuanced ruling on immunity.

The Yankee Marshal argues that the ATF is acting unconstitutionally as a rogue agency by reinterpreting, reclassifying, or expanding laws without congressional or judicial action. He asserts that only Congress can write laws and the courts can interpret them, not the ATF. This is presented as a deliberate strategy by politicians to disarm the populace without taking direct responsibility, with Congress granting the ATF unconstitutional authority.

This episode of GunForHireRadio, #533, discusses the current state of the US, referring to it as a 'Banana Republic' due to perceived defiance of the judicial branch by the executive branch. The hosts express extreme concern, humorously suggesting they'll be eating zoo animals soon. The description also promotes various Gun For Hire resources, including their website, academy, radio broadcast, and social media channels, along with information on obtaining firearm permits in New Jersey and New York, and a link to their book, 'Crime Proof'.

This video discusses the concept of separation of powers within a constitutional republic, specifically in the context of recent political pressure on the Supreme Court regarding gun rights cases. The speaker criticizes attempts to influence the court's decisions, emphasizing its role in the balance of power. The discussion touches upon the New York State Rifle and Pistol and New Jersey Concealed Carry cases as examples of current legal battles.