This video delves into the complexities of the Hughes Amendment (18 USC 922) and its impact on post-1986 machine gun ownership. It argues that the ATF's restrictive interpretation, codified in 27 CFR 479.105, was an overreach and misinterpretation of the statute, particularly in light of the overturned Chevron doctrine. The analysis suggests potential legal avenues for states to allow citizens to acquire these firearms under the 'under the authority of' clause, challenging the ATF's current stance.
This video features constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith discussing a significant Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) opinion issued under the Trump administration. The opinion, informed by the Supreme Court's decision in Loper Bright, effectively ends welfare benefits for illegal aliens by closing a loophole that originated during the Bill Clinton era. Smith also touches upon his article in the Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy concerning the delay of firearm carry licenses in anti-gun jurisdictions.
This video provides an expert legal analysis of the recent nationwide block of the ATF's Short Barreled Rifle and Pistol Brace Rule. It details Judge Reed O'Connor's final merits decision vacating the rule, citing violations of the Administrative Procedure Act due to the ATF's failure to demonstrate a logical outgrowth from the proposed rule. The analysis highlights the ATF's deadline to appeal and the potential impact of recent Supreme Court decisions on the ATF's regulatory authority.
This video analyzes the Supreme Court's Loper Bright decision and its implications for the ATF's regulatory power. The speaker, a constitutional attorney, argues that the ruling undermines the ATF's ability to reinterpret laws and regulations, particularly concerning firearms. The decision emphasizes the importance of contemporaneous interpretations by agencies at the time a statute was enacted, suggesting that later redefinitions by the ATF may be deemed invalid by courts.
This entry analyzes the potential impact of the Loper Bright case on the ATF's power, stemming from a discussion by constitutional attorney Mark Smith. The case could overturn Chevron deference, which allows federal agencies to interpret their own regulations, potentially limiting the ATF's ability to enforce gun laws based on their interpretations. Expert analysis suggests this could be a significant win for Second Amendment rights.
You've reached the end! 5 videos loaded.
Gun Laws by State
Read firearms regulations for all 50 states + D.C.
Find Gun Dealers
Search licensed FFL dealers near you.