This video discusses the legal ramifications of the DOJ data leak, focusing on individual lawsuits in small claims court as a viable option for CCW holders whose private information was compromised. It explains why class actions may be insufficient for emotional distress damages and outlines the procedural steps for filing an administrative claim to exhaust remedies before suing the state.
This video discusses a significant leak of personal information from the California Department of Justice, affecting individuals who applied for Concealed Carry Weapons (CCW) permits between 2012 and late 2021. The leak potentially exposed names, addresses, driver's license numbers, and could be cross-referenced with gun ownership data. It highlights ongoing legal actions, including a class-action lawsuit filed by the National Association for Gun Rights (NAGR) and separate legal efforts by the California Rifle and Pistol Association (CRPA), Gun Owners of California (GOC), and Michelle and Associates.
This video provides a detailed explanation of the mass action lawsuit initiated by Franklin Armory against the California Department of Justice, focusing on the Title 1 firearm. It clarifies who is eligible to join the lawsuit (those who placed a deposit), explains the distinction between the mass action lawsuit and Franklin Armory's separate legal action, and discusses the implications of new legislation like SB 118, which aims to redefine assault weapons and impact future firearm purchases. The speaker, an 'Armed Scholar,' emphasizes the importance of consumer participation and proactive engagement with representatives to oppose restrictive legislation.
This video discusses the Franklin Armory Title 1 firearm and its legal challenges in California, primarily focusing on SB 118. It explains how SB 118 aims to classify firearms like the Title 1 as assault weapons and mandates background checks for precursor parts. The video highlights two lawsuits: one by Franklin Armory against the California DOJ for refusing to process legal sales due to an outdated system, and a mass action lawsuit by Michelle and Associates for individuals unable to acquire their deposited firearms. The deadline to place a deposit for potential inclusion in the lawsuit is September 1st.
This video provides a crucial update on California's ghost gun regulations effective July 1st, 2018. It clarifies that even firearms manufactured before this date with existing serial numbers will require a new DOJ-approved serial number after July 1st. For unfinished polymer 80% lowers, new regulations mandate 3.7 ounces of metal content to facilitate markings, a requirement the speaker believes may effectively prohibit their use. The video strongly recommends viewing a webinar by Michelle and Associates and CRPA for comprehensive details.
You've reached the end! 5 videos loaded.
Gun Laws by State
Read firearms regulations for all 50 states + D.C.
Find Gun Dealers
Search licensed FFL dealers near you.