The US Army's decision to select the Sig Sauer P320 over Glock for its new sidearm was primarily driven by the P320's integrated external manual safety. While Glock has since developed modular capabilities, the Army's requirement for a manual safety stems from a perceived need to mitigate accidental discharges among less experienced recruits. Elite units like Delta Force, with highly qualified personnel, are permitted to use Glocks, highlighting a distinction in risk assessment based on user experience.
This video analyzes the US Army's decision to select the Sig Sauer P320 (M17/M18) over the Glock 19x for its Modular Handgun System (MHS). It details the Army's requirements, the competitive bidding process involving multiple manufacturers, and the key factors that led to Sig's selection, primarily focusing on modularity and a significantly lower bid price. The analysis also delves into criticisms of the P320's perceived reliability issues and the cost-effectiveness of its modular design compared to Glock.
You've reached the end! 2 videos loaded.
Gun Laws by State
Read firearms regulations for all 50 states + D.C.
Find Gun Dealers
Search licensed FFL dealers near you.