The Supreme Court has denied the BNL Productions v. Newsom case, which challenged California's ban on gun shows at state properties. This decision effectively upholds the ban, granting a win to Governor Gavin Newsom. The video also provides updates on the Snope and Ocean State cases, which remain pending and have been relisted for further conference, potentially indicating a summary disposition.
The Supreme Court has unanimously denied emergency review for the Antinuk case, which challenged New York's concealed carry laws post-Bruin. This decision suggests the Court is avoiding interlocutory reviews and preliminary injunctions, preferring to wait for final merits decisions. Cases like Wolford, Snope, and Ocean State Tactical may face similar outcomes or await final rulings.
This interview features Braden Langley of Langley Outdoors Academy discussing the political landscape surrounding Second Amendment rights and gun control. Langley shares his background, transitioning from politics to firearms advocacy due to YouTube's content restrictions. The conversation delves into the challenges of navigating online platforms, the impact of political administrations on gun legislation, and the potential future of gun control debates, including the significance of upcoming Supreme Court cases.
The US Supreme Court denied certiorari in Oakland Tactical Supply v. How Township, a case concerning the scope of training with firearms on long-range shooting facilities and associated zoning rules. While the court acknowledged the argument that the right to train is an ancillary right to the Second Amendment, they declined to hear the case, potentially due to its idiosyncratic nature and the existence of other, more impactful Second Amendment cases pending review, such as the Snope case regarding AR-15 bans.
This video discusses the State of Maryland's opposition brief to the U.S. Supreme Court regarding the 'Snope' case, which challenges Maryland's ban on semi-automatic rifles. The speaker, Mark Smith, a constitutional attorney, analyzes Maryland's arguments, highlighting perceived inconsistencies and legal misinterpretations of key Supreme Court decisions like Heller and Bruin. He argues that Maryland's brief attempts to delay a definitive ruling on the constitutionality of 'assault weapon' bans, particularly concerning firearms in common use.
A federal appeals court upheld the District of Columbia's ban on magazines holding more than 10 rounds in Hansen v. District of Columbia. While the majority ruled against the Second Amendment, the dissent by Judge Justin Walker, citing Mark Smith's scholarship, argued that such magazines are in common use and protected. The decision's analysis of historical analogues and the 'in common use' test has implications for future Second Amendment cases, including the upcoming Snope case.
This video provides an expert analysis from Constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith on a significant SCOTUS order in Gray v. Jennings, impacting preliminary injunction standards for Second Amendment cases. It details how this order may influence the AR-15 ban case, Snope, and discusses the strategic scheduling by the Supreme Court to potentially address critical gun rights issues in upcoming terms. The analysis highlights the importance of the Heller precedent and the expected stance of conservative justices on firearm rights.
You've reached the end! 7 videos loaded.
Gun Laws by State
Read firearms regulations for all 50 states + D.C.
Find Gun Dealers
Search licensed FFL dealers near you.
