This video discusses the case of Barbar v. Bon, challenging California's collection and sharing of sensitive personal data from firearm purchasers. The speaker argues that this practice violates the state's constitutional right to privacy, despite a written disclosure promising data would not be shared outside law enforcement. The case highlights concerns about government overreach and potential misuse of firearm owner data.
A federal district court in California denied a temporary restraining order (TRO) sought by gun owners to prevent the release of their private information. The court found no emergency, citing the delay in filing the TRO and the existing safeguards against public dissemination of the data. The ruling suggests a preliminary injunction may also be difficult to obtain, as the judge appears unconvinced of immediate harm.
California Assembly Bill 173, signed by Governor Newsom, allows the California Firearms Violence Research Center at UC Davis to access personal information of gun owners, including firearm details, names, and addresses. This raises significant privacy concerns due to past data breaches and the potential for misuse, as highlighted by the speaker's personal experience with a 2016/2017 CA DOJ data leak. The bill's implications for creating comprehensive gun owner lists and its link to universal background checks are critically examined.
You've reached the end! 3 videos loaded.
Gun Laws by State
Read firearms regulations for all 50 states + D.C.
Find Gun Dealers
Search licensed FFL dealers near you.
