This video discusses the Supreme Court's decision to review Loper Bright Enterprises V Raimondo, a case that could overturn Chevron deference. This legal doctrine allows federal agencies like the ATF to interpret existing laws, effectively creating new regulations. Overturning Chevron deference could significantly curtail the ATF's power, returning regulatory authority to Congress.
This video provides an expert analysis of the ATF's new pistol brace rule, detailing how it redefines a rifle to include braced pistols as Short Barreled Rifles (SBRs). It highlights Congress's intervention, including a letter from the House Judiciary Committee demanding testimony from ATF Director Dettelbach, and discusses the legal implications in light of the Supreme Court's decision in West Virginia v. EPA, particularly the major questions doctrine. The content emphasizes the need for clear congressional authorization for such significant regulatory actions by executive agencies.
William Kurt of Washington Gun Law advises against immediate amnesty registration for firearms with stabilizing braces due to ongoing legal challenges. He highlights three key lawsuits (Mock v Garland, Brito v ATF, FRAC v Garland) aiming to halt the ATF's rule, emphasizing the potential impact of temporary injunctions. Waiting 30-45 days allows the legal landscape to evolve, potentially offering a clearer path forward.
This YouTube video discusses the Supreme Court's decision to not hear cases challenging the bump stock ban. The creator expresses surprise and questions the logic of this decision, especially in light of the West Virginia v. EPA ruling. The video aims to analyze and discuss this significant legal development impacting gun rights.
You've reached the end! 4 videos loaded.
Gun Laws by State
Read firearms regulations for all 50 states + D.C.
Find Gun Dealers
Search licensed FFL dealers near you.
