Are Temu SLICE-Proof Gloves LEGIT 🔪? (don’t ever wear these gloves 💀)

This video tests two $30 Temu body armor plates against multiple calibers, from .380 Auto up to .454 Casull. Both the soft panel and hard plate successfully stopped all tested rounds, though the soft armor showed significant damage and delamination, especially from higher-powered rounds. The .454 Casull caused extreme backface deformation on the soft armor but did not penetrate.

This review tests a budget ballistic mask from Temu, allegedly rated for handgun calibers up to .44 Magnum. While it successfully stops numerous rounds from .22LR to 7.5 FK Brno, significant backface deformation occurs with smaller calibers, posing a risk of blunt force trauma. The mask ultimately fails against the powerful .460 S&W Magnum round. The review highlights the ethical considerations of using uncertified budget gear and the inherent dangers of blunt force trauma.

This video compares a $10 Temu digital night vision device against a $10,000 professional analog setup. The Temu device suffers from significant lag and a highly visible IR signature, making it impractical for tactical use. In contrast, the high-end analog system offers superior clarity and real-time performance without revealing the user's position.

A $35 HWIN body armor plate from Temu was tested against .22 LR, 9mm, and .357 Magnum rounds. Despite significant surface damage from the .357 Magnum, the plate did not penetrate, showing surprising performance for its low cost. The test highlights potential budget options for protective gear, though professional certification is not implied.

This review tests budget tactical gear from Temu, finding mixed results. While some items like glove holders and magnetic mounts are functional passes, others like reactive targets and knock-off gloves are outright fails. Chinese slings are usable but carry a risk of firearm damage. PMAG pull tabs are only compatible with specific generations.

A $25 Temu body armor plate was tested against a 75-pound draw Steambow AR-6 Stinger II repeating crossbow. While the armor previously stopped 9mm and .223 rounds, a crossbow bolt penetrated about two-thirds of the way through, demonstrating that 'bulletproof' does not equate to 'bolt-proof'. The test highlights the limitations of budget armor against different projectile types.

This comedic skit humorously emphasizes the critical importance of wearing eye protection at the shooting range. It illustrates a handgun malfunction, specifically a stovepipe, and uses a visual gag with a spent casing to drive home the safety message. The creator showcases tactical gear and a Sig Sauer P365 XL, demonstrating firearm handling in a range environment.

This video tests the penetration capabilities of various calibers, from .22 LR to .50 BMG, against a tree. Surprisingly, even the powerful .50 BMG round failed to penetrate the tree completely, demonstrating the significant stopping power of natural barriers against firearms.

This video explores the hypothetical concept of using a human body as a suppressor, simulating the scenario with ballistic gel. A Derya Arms .22 rifle is fired into a ballistic gel head, with the host noting the shot sounded 'dead silent'. The experiment demonstrates the penetration depth of a .22 LR round through the simulated head.

This test evaluates the ballistic protection of a Belgian M1 steel helmet against various calibers. While it stopped birdshot, .22, and .380 Auto rounds, it failed to defeat 9mm and .223 Remington rounds, indicating it is not suitable for protection against common handgun or rifle threats.