Q&A: Why Not More Bayonets on SMGs?

Published on May 17, 2025
Duration: 0:59

This Q&A from Forgotten Weapons explores why bayonets were rarely fitted to submachine guns (SMGs). While more SMGs had bayonet lugs than commonly believed, military doctrine typically issued SMGs to specialized troops, not general infantry. For line infantry, rifles were the primary weapon, and a bayonet is significantly more effective on a longer rifle than on a shorter SMG.

Quick Summary

Submachine guns were rarely equipped with bayonets because they were issued to specialized troops, not general infantry. Furthermore, a bayonet is significantly less effective on a short SMG compared to a full-length rifle, limiting its practical utility.

Chapters

  1. 00:00The Question of SMG Bayonets
  2. 00:12Prevalence and Military Doctrine
  3. 00:46Infantry Roles and Utility

Frequently Asked Questions

Why were submachine guns (SMGs) rarely equipped with bayonets?

SMGs were typically issued to specialized troops, not general infantry. Military doctrine favored rifles for line infantry, and bayonets are far less effective on the shorter platform of an SMG compared to a full-length rifle.

Did many submachine guns have bayonet lugs?

Yes, more submachine guns were designed with bayonet lugs than commonly realized. However, their practical utility was limited by the SMG's role and design compared to a rifle.

What is the main reason a bayonet is less useful on an SMG?

The primary reason is the SMG's shorter overall length. A bayonet's effectiveness as a stabbing weapon is significantly reduced when attached to a compact firearm like an SMG, versus a longer rifle.

Who typically received submachine guns in military forces?

Submachine guns were generally issued to specialized units, officers, and leaders within a military structure, rather than being standard issue for general line infantry soldiers.

More General Videos You Might Like

More from Forgotten Weapons

View all →