Tommy Gun + Grease Gun

Published on February 15, 2011
Duration: 1:46

This video compares the iconic Thompson SMG with the M3 Grease Gun, highlighting the Grease Gun's significantly lower WWII production cost and time. The M3, made of stamped steel, is noted for its full-auto-only operation and a unique dust cover safety, and it demonstrated a tighter shot pattern than the Thompson.

Quick Summary

The M3 Grease Gun was a cost-effective WWII alternative to the Thompson SMG, costing only $3 vs $300 and taking 1 hour to make vs 20. Made of stamped steel, it's full-auto only with a dust cover safety and demonstrated a tighter shot pattern.

Chapters

  1. 00:08Thompson SMG Demonstration
  2. 00:37M3 Grease Gun History and Cost
  3. 00:58M3 Grease Gun Features and Shooting

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the main difference in cost between the Thompson SMG and the M3 Grease Gun during WWII?

During World War II, the M3 Grease Gun was significantly cheaper to produce than the Thompson SMG. The M3 cost approximately $3 per unit, while the Thompson cost around $300, representing a massive cost difference.

How did the production time compare for the Thompson and the M3 Grease Gun?

The M3 Grease Gun was designed for rapid, efficient production. It took about 1 hour to manufacture an M3, a stark contrast to the 20 hours required to produce a Thompson submachine gun.

What are the key construction and operational features of the M3 Grease Gun?

The M3 Grease Gun is primarily constructed from stamped steel, making it simpler and cheaper to produce. It features full-auto-only fire and uses its dust cover as a safety mechanism.

Which firearm, the Thompson or the M3 Grease Gun, showed a tighter shot pattern?

In the demonstration, the M3 Grease Gun exhibited a noticeably tighter shot pattern on the silhouette target compared to the Thompson submachine gun, suggesting better practical accuracy in this comparison.

Related News

All News →

More General Videos You Might Like

More from FPSRussia

View all →