Are Revolvers Obsolete?

Published on March 14, 2025
Duration: 10:47

This review challenges the notion of revolver obsolescence by comparing classic revolvers like the Smith & Wesson Model 65, S&W 642, and Kimber K6s against modern semi-automatics like the Glock 17. The speaker argues that for civilian self-defense, a 5 or 6-shot revolver is statistically sufficient, citing the 'Rule of Threes' and distinguishing defensive needs from offensive roles.

Quick Summary

Revolvers are not obsolete for civilian self-defense. The 'Rule of Threes' suggests 3 rounds at 3 yards in 3 seconds are often sufficient, making a 5 or 6-shot revolver statistically adequate for most non-professional encounters.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Intro: Are Revolvers Obsolete?
  2. 01:01Revolver Models & Comparison (S&W, Kimber vs Glock)
  3. 04:41The Rule of Threes & Civilian Defense
  4. 08:00Defensive vs. Offensive Roles: Revolver Relevance

Frequently Asked Questions

Are revolvers still a viable option for self-defense?

Yes, revolvers remain a viable option for civilian self-defense. The speaker argues that for non-professionals, a 5 or 6-shot revolver is statistically sufficient, especially considering the 'Rule of Threes' often applies to defensive encounters.

What is the 'Rule of Threes' in civilian defense?

The 'Rule of Threes' suggests that civilian self-defense encounters typically involve around 3 rounds fired, at a distance of 3 yards, within 3 seconds. This highlights that high capacity may not always be necessary.

How do revolvers compare to modern semi-automatic pistols like the Glock 17?

Revolvers offer simplicity and reliability, often with lower capacity (5-6 rounds) like the S&W Model 65 or 642. Semi-automatics like the Glock 17 provide higher capacity but can be more complex.

What are the key differences between defensive and offensive firearm roles?

The defensive role involves using a firearm to 'get out of trouble,' where a revolver's simplicity and sufficient capacity are often adequate. The offensive role, typically for professionals, involves 'going to the trouble,' which may favor higher capacity firearms.

Related News

All News →

More Reviews Videos You Might Like

More from hickok45

View all →