British Submachine Gun Overview: Lanchester, Sten, Sterling, and More!

Published on March 12, 2017
Duration: 23:50

This review details the evolution of British submachine guns, starting with the Lanchester as a MP28 copy and progressing to the mass-producible Sten series. It highlights the Sten's cost-effectiveness and reliability issues, contrasting it with the more refined Mark V. The video also covers experimental designs and concludes with the Sterling L2A3, praised for its innovative magazine design and long service life.

Quick Summary

The Sten gun was designed for cheap, rapid mass production, requiring only 5.5 man-hours to build. While the Mark II became iconic, its single-feed magazine design was prone to friction and reliability issues, a contrast to the later Sterling's superior double-feed magazine.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Intro: British SMG Development
  2. 01:23The Lanchester Submachine Gun
  3. 04:15The Sten Gun (Mk I & Mk II)
  4. 08:03Sten Mk III & Technical Overview
  5. 13:12Sten Mk V & Post-War
  6. 16:41Experimental Models: Vesely, MCEM, BSA
  7. 19:48The Sterling Submachine Gun (L2A3)

Frequently Asked Questions

Why was Britain initially slow to adopt submachine guns?

Britain was unusual in entering WWII without an indigenous SMG. The military initially dismissed them as 'gangster guns,' a perception that shifted only in 1939 as the necessity for such weapons became apparent.

What made the Sten gun so significant?

The Sten gun was designed for cheap, rapid mass production, requiring minimal man-hours. Its simplicity allowed for widespread adoption despite some reliability issues, making it a crucial weapon during WWII.

How did the Sterling SMG improve upon the Sten?

The Sterling's primary advancement was its magazine design: a double-feed, double-stack system with rollers on the follower. This significantly improved reliability compared to the Sten's single-feed magazine.

What was the Lanchester SMG's role?

The Lanchester was Britain's first SMG, developed as a copy of the German MP28. It was adopted by the Royal Navy due to its higher quality, though its cost and weight made it less suitable for mass issue than later designs.

More Reviews Videos You Might Like

More from Forgotten Weapons

View all →