HI POINT VS GLOCK

Published on August 31, 2021
Duration: 16:05

This video compares a Hi-Point JCP 40 against a Glock 22 in .40 caliber, subjecting both to extreme reliability tests including hollow points, water, mud, and sand. Surprisingly, the Hi-Point outperformed the Glock in the sand test, demonstrating unexpected durability. The Olight Baldr Pro weapon light is also featured.

Quick Summary

In a comparison video, the Hi-Point JCP 40 and Glock 22 were subjected to torture tests. While both handled hollow points, water, and mud, the Glock 22 failed during a sand test, whereas the Hi-Point JCP 40 continued to function, demonstrating surprising durability.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction & Channel Update
  2. 01:04Firearms Introduced: Hi-Point JCP 40 vs Glock 22
  3. 03:11Product Spotlight: Olight Baldr Pro
  4. 03:58Hollow Point Reliability Test
  5. 06:10Water and Mud Torture Tests
  6. 09:57Sand Torture Test & Glock Failure
  7. 11:55Conclusion & Final Thoughts

Frequently Asked Questions

How did the Hi-Point JCP 40 and Glock 22 perform in extreme torture tests?

Both pistols were tested with hollow points, water, mud, and sand. While both handled hollow points, water, and mud well, the Glock 22 failed with a 'dead trigger' during the sand test, whereas the Hi-Point JCP 40 continued to function.

What are the key specifications for the Hi-Point JCP 40 and Glock 22?

The Hi-Point JCP 40 is chambered in .40 S&W, has a 10+1 capacity, weighs 35 oz, and has an MSRP around $200. The Glock 22, also in .40 S&W, offers 15+1 capacity, weighs 25.59 oz unloaded, and typically retails between $500-$600.

Which pistol was more reliable in the sand torture test?

In the sand torture test, the Hi-Point JCP 40 proved more reliable. The Glock 22 suffered a 'dead trigger' failure after sand was introduced into its action, while the Hi-Point continued to fire successfully.

Related News

All News →

More Reviews Videos You Might Like

More from GHG Hussle

View all →