I Tested 2 Top PCCs – B&T GHM9 vs Black Jack… There’s a Clear Winner

Published on February 16, 2025
Duration: 7:45

This video compares the B&T GHM9 and the Sholo Blackjack PCCs, evaluating their blowback systems, trigger weights, controls, disassembly processes, and pricing. The Sholo Blackjack features a roll pin delayed blowback and a light 2-3 lb Hyperfire trigger, while the B&T GHM9 uses direct blowback with a hydraulic buffer and a heavier 4-5 lb trigger. The B&T offers fully ambidextrous controls, whereas the Blackjack has AK-style, non-ambidextrous features. Disassembly is simpler on the Blackjack, but the B&T is considered more rugged and modular.

Quick Summary

The Sholo Blackjack features a roll pin delayed blowback system and a light 2-3 lb trigger, offering less recoil and a crisp feel. The B&T GHM9 uses direct blowback with a hydraulic buffer and a heavier 4-5 lb trigger. While the B&T boasts fully ambidextrous controls and rugged modularity, the Blackjack is simpler to disassemble and more budget-friendly.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Intro: Blackjack vs B&T
  2. 00:22Blowback System Comparison
  3. 01:06Trigger Comparison
  4. 02:21Control Layout (AK vs Ambi)
  5. 03:41Disassembly Process
  6. 05:45Price Point Analysis
  7. 06:26Which PCC is Better?
  8. 06:46Summary & Conclusion

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the key differences in the blowback systems of the B&T GHM9 and Sholo Blackjack?

The Sholo Blackjack uses a roll pin delayed blowback system, noted for minimal recoil. The B&T GHM9 employs a direct blowback system with a hydraulic buffer, which results in slightly more felt recoil compared to the Blackjack.

How do the triggers of the B&T GHM9 and Sholo Blackjack compare?

The Sholo Blackjack features a crisp 2-3 lb Hyperfire trigger, ideal for fast shooting. The B&T GHM9 has a heavier 4-5 lb trigger, which can become tiring during extended rapid fire, though it offers a distinct wall.

Which PCC offers better ergonomics and controls?

The B&T GHM9 is fully ambidextrous with controls on both sides and a reversible charging handle. The Sholo Blackjack has AK-style controls that are not ambidextrous, which may be a drawback for some users.

What are the price differences between the B&T GHM9 and Sholo Blackjack?

The Sholo Blackjack is generally more affordable, costing around $1,600-$1,700 with a stock. The B&T GHM9 starts at $1,700-$1,800 without a stock, and adding accessories like the shown stock can push the total cost significantly higher.

Related News

All News →

More Reviews Videos You Might Like

More from Alyssa Seymour

View all →