Revolvers VS Watermelons .38 Special .357 Magnum .44 Special .44 Magnum .45 Colt

This guide explores three essential .357 Magnum revolvers for any collection: the Ruger GP100, Smith & Wesson 686 Plus Deluxe, and Colt Python Combat Elite. It details their features, specifications, and price points, aiding in selection based on personal preference and budget. The presenter highlights the growing popularity of revolvers due to their operational simplicity and reliability.

This review from TheYankeeMarshal explores pocket carry options, highlighting the Colt Viper for its slim profile and capacity for .357 Magnum/.38 Special rounds. The Schofield Revolver is also discussed, noted for its one-handed reload potential but high cost. The speaker's informal yet opinionated tone and specific product knowledge suggest high authority.

The Yankee Marshal is contemplating a firearm purchase using birthday gift certificates. He is torn between acquiring a Henry .357 Magnum lever-action rifle with a desirable case-hardened finish and an octagonal barrel, or waiting for a Chiappa Rhino in .44 Magnum. He also briefly considers a Colt Python but dismisses it for his personal use. The decision hinges on practicality versus the desire for a specific, currently unavailable model.

This review of the Ruger LCRx highlights its practicality as a carry gun, despite its less-than-ideal aesthetics. The speaker expresses a preference for the LCRx over the standard LCR, particularly disliking double-action-only designs. The innovative construction using polymer, aluminum, and steel is noted, with a mention that .357 Magnum variants are typically all-steel and heavier.

This review of the Taurus Judge revolver, presented by Ben Wah of Tactical Fellowship, highlights its unique dual-caliber capability (.45 Colt and .410 shotshell) and its historical context. The video explores its effectiveness for home defense, particularly with .410 buckshot, and discusses its performance characteristics, including trigger pull and accuracy trade-offs. It also touches on potential criticisms and aftermarket accessories like the Midwest Industries brace.

This expert review from NRA Publications' 'Gun of the Week' series provides a comprehensive look at the Taurus 66 Combat revolver. Executive Editor Jay Grazio highlights its robust all-steel construction, 7-round .357 Magnum capacity, and practical features like a fiber optic front sight and optics-ready frame. The review emphasizes its suitability as a defensive firearm, noting its excellent trigger and comfortable Hogue grips, making it a strong contender for revolver enthusiasts.

This video compares the terminal performance of five common pistol calibers (.22LR, .380 ACP, 9mm, .40 S&W, .45 ACP) by shooting watermelons. The test demonstrates a significant increase in destructive power from .22LR up to .45 ACP, with the larger calibers causing more explosive expansion and fragmentation. Specific hollow-point ammunition from Speer, Aguila, and Underwood was used, highlighting the importance of bullet construction for terminal ballistics.

Buckeye Ballistics conducted a comparative test of common pistol calibers (.22LR, .380 ACP, 9mm, .40 S&W, .45 ACP) against concrete blocks. The host, demonstrating significant firearm and ballistics knowledge, emphasized extreme safety precautions due to ricochet risks. The test revealed that while larger calibers showed more damage, none could fully penetrate the concrete block's second wall, suggesting limitations for self-defense scenarios against hardened barriers.

This Taurus TX22 review details its performance with various .22 LR ammunition. While initially reliable with CCI Mini-Mags and cycling standard velocity rounds well, it encountered malfunctions with sub-sonic and high-velocity loads. A catastrophic failure occurred due to a squib load followed by a second shot, resulting in a bulged barrel and damaged magazine.

This video compares the terminal ballistics of .22LR, .22WMR, and .17HMR rimfire cartridges using cantaloupes as targets. The .22LR showed a clean pass-through with minor damage, the .22WMR caused an explosive front-face disintegration, and the .17HMR, despite its speed, disintegrated internally with no exit. The test highlights how different rimfire rounds perform on soft tissue simulants.