Ruger or S&W?..GP100 vs 686+!.. Direct Comparison...Inside & Out!

Published on June 18, 2024
Duration: 21:02

This video provides a direct, in-depth comparison between the Ruger GP100 and the Smith & Wesson 686+, examining their exteriors and internals. The presenter, TheYankeeMarshal, highlights differences in barrel design, sights, frame construction, and internal mechanisms, offering insights into the engineering choices and potential advantages of each model. The comparison aims to help viewers decide between these two popular revolvers based on build quality, design philosophy, and user experience.

Quick Summary

The Ruger GP100 and Smith & Wesson 686+ revolvers share similarities but differ in key areas. The Ruger offers easier front sight replacement via dovetails and a more robust crane lockup. Internally, the Ruger uses a hammer strut and coil spring system within a unibody frame, contrasting with the S&W's leaf spring and side-plate design. The S&W's internal lock is a notable aesthetic drawback.

Chapters

  1. 00:11Introduction & Comparison Setup
  2. 01:14Exterior Comparison: Barrels & Ejector Rods
  3. 02:57Muzzle Profile & Crown Comparison
  4. 03:26Sights: Front & Rear Dovetails
  5. 04:50Frame & Crane Design Differences
  6. 05:41Ruger's Front Lockup System
  7. 06:55Trigger Design Comparison
  8. 07:31Cylinder Area & Frame Body
  9. 08:27Rear Frame & Grip Tangs
  10. 09:03The S&W Internal Lock
  11. 09:40Cylinder Release Mechanisms
  12. 10:20Hammer Design Comparison
  13. 11:29Internal Mechanics: Grips & Spring Systems
  14. 13:39Unibody vs. Side Plate Construction
  15. 14:11Internal Parts Functionality
  16. 16:00Trigger Rebound & Other Internals
  17. 17:20Cylinder Latch/Bolt Differences
  18. 17:55Mechanical Similarities & Complexity
  19. 18:32Final Decision: S&W vs. Ruger

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the key exterior differences between the Ruger GP100 and the Smith & Wesson 686+?

Exterior differences include the Ruger's simpler ejector rod and thicker channel, its dovetailed front sight for easier replacement, and a deeper muzzle crown. The S&W 686+ has a more polished ejector rod and pinned front sights, which are harder to change. Both have similar barrel designs with top ribs and full underlugs.

How do the internal mechanisms of the Ruger GP100 and S&W 686+ compare?

Internally, the S&W 686+ uses a traditional leaf-style mainspring with a stirrup, while the Ruger GP100 employs a hammer strut and coiled spring. The Ruger's unibody construction differs from the S&W's side-plate design, affecting how internal parts are housed and accessed.

What are the main aesthetic and functional drawbacks of the Smith & Wesson 686+?

A significant drawback of the S&W 686+ is its integrated internal safety lock, which the presenter finds to be an 'eyesore.' Additionally, the pinned front sights are considered less convenient for replacement compared to the Ruger's dovetailed sights.

Which revolver offers a more robust lockup system, the Ruger GP100 or the S&W 686+?

The Ruger GP100 features a front lockup system on the crane, which the presenter believes is stronger and more robust than the Smith & Wesson 686+'s lockup mechanism that engages the end of the ejector rod.

Related News

All News →

More Reviews Videos You Might Like

More from TheYankeeMarshal

View all →