SIG P320 Subcompact vs FNS-9 Compact

Published on May 20, 2015
Duration: 34:18

This comprehensive review compares the SIG Sauer P320 Subcompact and the FNS-9 Compact, highlighting their similarities and differences in performance, ergonomics, and features. The instructor, Justin Opinion, provides an expert-level analysis based on extensive range testing, offering insights into trigger quality, recoil handling, and overall shooting experience. Both firearms are deemed excellent choices for concealed carry and home defense, with specific recommendations based on individual preferences.

Quick Summary

The SIG Sauer P320 Subcompact and FNS-9 Compact are both excellent 9mm subcompact pistols for concealed carry and home defense. The P320 offers a superior trigger, perceived softer recoil, and better accuracy at 25 yards. The FNS-9 Compact provides a fuller grip and more magazine options. Both are reliable, but the P320's trigger and accuracy give it a slight edge for many users.

Chapters

  1. 00:52Introduction: P320 Subcompact vs FNS-9 Compact
  2. 03:01Magazine Comparison and Capacity
  3. 06:38Shooting the FNS-9 Compact
  4. 09:31Shooting the SIG Sauer P320 Subcompact
  5. 12:51Post-Range Thoughts and Initial Impressions
  6. 13:37Carry and Home Defense Suitability
  7. 14:14Recoil and Shooting Feel Comparison
  8. 14:38Grip and Ergonomics Differences
  9. 15:06Trigger Reach and Trigger Quality
  10. 16:15Controls and Streamlining
  11. 16:36Takedown Levers and Bore Axis
  12. 17:06Included Accessories: Holster and Magazines
  13. 19:11Specifications and Measurements
  14. 19:47Weight Comparison
  15. 20:10Height Comparison
  16. 20:42Thickness Comparison
  17. 21:21Grip Thickness Comparison
  18. 22:00Trigger Reach Measurements
  19. 22:51Trigger Pull Weight Measurements
  20. 23:35Magazine Feel and Grip Subjectivity
  21. 25:04Accessory Rails and Serrations
  22. 25:19Sight Comparison
  23. 25:59Trigger Guard Comparison
  24. 26:40Aesthetics and Fit/Finish
  25. 28:25Takedown Method: FNS-9 Compact
  26. 29:23Takedown Method: SIG Sauer P320
  27. 30:5825-Yard Accuracy Test Results
  28. 32:31Final Comparison and Conclusion

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the key differences between the SIG Sauer P320 Subcompact and the FNS-9 Compact?

Key differences include trigger quality (P320 superior), grip ergonomics (FNS fuller, P320 thinner), recoil management (P320 perceived softer), accuracy (P320 better at 25 yards), and included accessories (FNS has more magazines, P320 includes a holster). Both are reliable 9mm subcompacts suitable for carry.

Which pistol has a better trigger: the SIG P320 Subcompact or the FNS-9 Compact?

The SIG Sauer P320 Subcompact's trigger is considered superior. It is lighter, smoother, crisper, has less travel, and features a phenomenal reset, making it a standout feature compared to the FNS-9 Compact's good, but less refined, trigger.

How do the ergonomics and grip feel between the P320 Subcompact and FNS-9 Compact?

The FNS-9 Compact offers a fuller grip with aggressive stippling, enhanced by its magazine options. The P320 Subcompact has a thinner, flatter grip. Both have good ergonomics, but the feel is distinctly different, catering to individual hand shapes and preferences.

Which pistol is more accurate at 25 yards, the SIG P320 Subcompact or the FNS-9 Compact?

In testing, the SIG Sauer P320 Subcompact demonstrated better accuracy at 25 yards, achieving a best five-shot group of 1.786 inches. The FNS-9 Compact's best group was larger at 2.791 inches, indicating the P320 has an accuracy advantage.

Related News

All News →

More Reviews Videos You Might Like

More from Justin Opinion

View all →