Taurus PT140 Pro Review & Shoot .40 S&W

This video focuses on the Taurus 817 revolver chambered in .38 Special. While the description is minimal, the title clearly indicates a review or examination of this specific firearm model. Potential viewers would be interested in its features, performance, and suitability for various applications.

This YouTube video focuses on identifying and reviewing what the creator believes to be the "best Taurus carry gun ever made." While the description is brief, the title clearly indicates a review and recommendation of a specific Taurus firearm for concealed carry purposes. The content likely involves an evaluation of the pistol's features, performance, and suitability for everyday carry.

This video from Justin Opinion Channel provides a detailed comparison between the Ruger Security-9 and the Taurus G3C pistols. Emphasizing safe and responsible firearm handling, the review is conducted by a professional shooter and certified instructor in a controlled range environment using remote cameras. The channel clarifies that the content is for informational and entertainment purposes, with no direct sales or industry payments influencing reviews. Affiliate links are disclosed for supporting content creation and potentially saving viewers money on products like LOK Grips, Blade-Tech Holsters, Tactical AR500 Targets, and Talon Grips. Support for the channel through Patreon is also encouraged.

This YouTube video features a test of the Taurus G2c pistol, with the title playfully suggesting viewers might be drawn by the comments section. The content focuses on evaluating the firearm's performance, likely at a shooting range. While the specific caliber isn't mentioned in the title or description, the Taurus G2c typically fires 9mm ammunition, which is a common caliber for this type of pistol. The video appears to be a hands-on review of the firearm.

This YouTube video offers a direct comparison between two popular pistols: the Canik MC-9 and the Taurus GX-4. The title "Canik ou Taurus: Qual pistola manda melhor?" (Canik or Taurus: Which pistol reigns supreme?) clearly indicates a head-to-head evaluation. The video aims to help viewers decide which firearm is superior, likely covering aspects such as performance, features, ergonomics, and value for money. Given the specific model names and the comparative nature, it's geared towards individuals interested in purchasing a new pistol, particularly in the concealed carry or self-defense categories.

This video review focuses on the Taurus PT-145, highlighting it as a subcompact pistol. The description emphasizes its budget-friendly nature, suggesting it's a capable option for those seeking an affordable firearm. The content likely covers its features, performance, and suitability for various applications, particularly given the mention of "budget" and "beast" which implies a focus on value and effectiveness. It's aimed at viewers interested in practical and economical handgun choices.

This video compares the terminal performance of five common pistol calibers (.22LR, .380 ACP, 9mm, .40 S&W, .45 ACP) by shooting watermelons. The test demonstrates a significant increase in destructive power from .22LR up to .45 ACP, with the larger calibers causing more explosive expansion and fragmentation. Specific hollow-point ammunition from Speer, Aguila, and Underwood was used, highlighting the importance of bullet construction for terminal ballistics.

Buckeye Ballistics conducted a comparative test of common pistol calibers (.22LR, .380 ACP, 9mm, .40 S&W, .45 ACP) against concrete blocks. The host, demonstrating significant firearm and ballistics knowledge, emphasized extreme safety precautions due to ricochet risks. The test revealed that while larger calibers showed more damage, none could fully penetrate the concrete block's second wall, suggesting limitations for self-defense scenarios against hardened barriers.

This Taurus TX22 review details its performance with various .22 LR ammunition. While initially reliable with CCI Mini-Mags and cycling standard velocity rounds well, it encountered malfunctions with sub-sonic and high-velocity loads. A catastrophic failure occurred due to a squib load followed by a second shot, resulting in a bulged barrel and damaged magazine.

This video compares the terminal ballistics of .22LR, .22WMR, and .17HMR rimfire cartridges using cantaloupes as targets. The .22LR showed a clean pass-through with minor damage, the .22WMR caused an explosive front-face disintegration, and the .17HMR, despite its speed, disintegrated internally with no exit. The test highlights how different rimfire rounds perform on soft tissue simulants.