This WEAPON costs HOW MUCH to Fire? (not what you’re thinking) #civtac #gun #fullautofriday

Published on December 29, 2023
Duration: 0:56

This video from Civilian Tactical explores the cost of firing various high-end weapons, comparing a .50 BMG Raptor 50 rifle to the Pulsefire Flamethrower. The host, an expert in tactical gear, highlights the significant per-round cost of .50 BMG ammunition ($6-$8) and contrasts it with the operational cost of the flamethrower, which uses gasoline and costs approximately $11 to fill its 3+ gallon tank. The demonstration shows the flamethrower's effectiveness in an outdoor setting.

Quick Summary

The cost to fire a .50 BMG round from a rifle like the Raptor 50 ranges from $6.00 to $8.00. In contrast, the Pulsefire Flamethrower uses gasoline, with a full 3+ gallon tank costing approximately $11.00 to fill. A continuous blast from the flamethrower can thus be more expensive to operate than a single .50 BMG round.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Raptor 50 Cost Introduction
  2. 00:16Pulsefire Flamethrower Reveal
  3. 00:31Flamethrower Operational Cost & Demo

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the cost to fire a .50 BMG rifle like the Raptor 50?

According to Civilian Tactical, firing a .50 BMG round from a rifle like the Raptor 50 can cost between $6.00 and $8.00 per shot due to the specialized ammunition required for this caliber.

How much does it cost to operate a Pulsefire Flamethrower?

The Pulsefire Flamethrower, using gasoline, costs approximately $11.00 to fill its 3+ gallon backpack tank. A full tank used in one continuous blast can be more expensive to operate than a single .50 BMG round.

Which is more expensive to fire: a .50 BMG round or a flamethrower?

For a single shot, a .50 BMG round is more expensive ($6-$8). However, operating a Pulsefire Flamethrower for its full tank capacity (3+ gallons for ~$11) in one continuous burst can exceed the cost of a single .50 BMG round.

More Tactical & Gear Videos You Might Like

More from Civilian Tactical

View all →