SAF FILES REPLY BRIEF IN CASE CHALLENGING WARRANTLESS GUN DEALER SEARCHES

Matt Coffey
Court Cases
2A Win

Summary

The Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) has filed a reply brief with the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in Schmidt v. Paris, a case challenging state regulations and county policy requiring warrantless searches and seizures from licensed firearms dealers. The lawsuit alleges that Pennsylvania State Police (PSP) regulations and Montgomery County Sheriff's policy, which compel FFL applicants to agree to warrantless inspections and allow seizure of employees for questioning, violate the Pennsylvania state constitution.

Read Full Article at Second Amendment Foundation

Tags

court-case
due-process
federal-firearms-licensee
state-law
saf
warrantless-search

Pennsylvania Gun Laws

Read the full breakdown of firearms regulations in Pennsylvania.

View Laws →

Related Articles