Videos tagged with Act 52

This video analyzes Hawaii's post-Bruen concealed carry laws, focusing on Act 52's default ban on private property and extensive 'sensitive places' list. It highlights the legal challenge arguing these restrictions lack historical precedent and are a workaround to the Bruen decision. The analysis includes the DOJ's amicus brief and the potential impact of a Supreme Court ruling on similar laws nationwide.

This video analyzes the Trump DOJ's challenge to Hawaii's strict public carry law, Act 52, arguing it effectively creates a near-total ban by designating numerous locations as 'sensitive places' and imposing a default ban on private property. The analysis highlights how this law conflicts with the Supreme Court's Bruen decision, which requires restrictions to align with historical traditions of firearm regulation. The implications extend to other blue states, potentially forcing them to revise their own post-Bruen gun laws.

This video provides an expert analysis of the legal challenge against Hawaii's firearm carry ban, led by Montana Attorney General Austin Knudsen. It details how 27 states are urging the Supreme Court to strike down Hawaii's Act 52, which is described as a 'default carry ban' and a violation of the Bruen decision. The content highlights Hawaii's reliance on questionable historical laws and its openly hostile stance towards Second Amendment rights, warning of potential nationwide implications if Hawaii prevails.

This video discusses the legal challenge to Hawaii's concealed carry laws, specifically Act 52, which restricts carrying firearms on public and private property. The DOJ under the Trump administration filed an amicus brief supporting Supreme Court review, arguing the ban contradicts the Bruen decision. Hawaii's response argues against review, citing the case's interlocutory posture and lack of a circuit split.

This video from Guns & Gadgets discusses a significant legal challenge to firearms restrictions in Hawaii, specifically Act 52, which designates many public areas as 'sensitive places' where carrying firearms is prohibited. A coalition of 26 state attorneys general, led by Montana's AG Austin Kudson, has urged the Supreme Court to review the Ninth Circuit's decision that reinstated these restrictions, arguing they conflict with Supreme Court precedents like Heller and Bruen. The outcome could have nationwide implications for Second Amendment rights and state-level gun control measures.