Videos tagged with Appeals Court

This video discusses the significance of a judge remaining silent during oral arguments. It suggests that a judge's silence might indicate their mind is already made up, or it could simply be their personal bench demeanor. The analysis also touches on how to infer a judge's leanings, such as by their nominating president or past Second Amendment rulings, while acknowledging that such inferences are not always definitive.

This video discusses a legal case involving Gary Sanchez and the CRPA challenging California's restrictions on suppressors. Sanchez's attempt to 3D print his own suppressors was hindered by a denied federal permit due to the state ban. After his initial lawsuit was dismissed in the district court, he appealed to the Ninth Circuit, which has expressed interest in hearing the case by assigning counsel.

This video provides an expert-level analysis of the Supreme Court's unanimous 9-0 decision in Barnes v. Felix, focusing on its implications for Fourth Amendment rights and excessive force claims. The speaker, an authority on legal commentary, breaks down the rejection of the 'moment-of-threat' rule and the mandate for a 'totality of the circumstances' analysis in excessive force cases involving fleeing suspects. The discussion highlights potential defiance from lower courts and the future legal battles ahead.

This video details the legal journey of a lawsuit challenging a law that initially barred advertising at youth sporting events. It explains how the CRPA and other organizations filed suit, leading to the legislature passing AB160 to clarify the law. The narrative follows the denial of a preliminary injunction, subsequent similar lawsuits, and the eventual overturning of those denials by a three-judge panel at the Ninth Circuit, remanding the case for further proceedings.

This video discusses the legal ramifications of ammunition possession in Missouri, particularly for individuals with non-violent felony convictions. It highlights a case where a man was arrested for illegal possession of ammunition despite not having a firearm, leading to a prison sentence due to parole conditions. The speaker expresses concern over federal actions impacting Second Amendment rights in states that previously enacted preservation laws.

The "craziest gun case in America right now" is in Tennessee, involving Hughes v. Lee. This case successfully challenged Tennessee's "going armed" law (TCA 39-17-1307A) and a law prohibiting firearms in parks (TCA 39-17-1311A). Despite being struck down by a lower court as violating the Second Amendment, the Tennessee Attorney General is appealing, aiming to reinstate these laws.

This video discusses a significant legal decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit regarding sensitive places and firearm licensing, issued after a two-year wait. Mark Smith, a constitutional attorney and Second Amendment scholar, provides analysis. The description highlights his expertise, referencing his previous legal scholarship used in court cases, his role as a frequent Fox News guest, and his bestselling books that cover Second Amendment topics, gun owner advocacy, and current events related to firearms.

This video provides a detailed update on the case of Navy Sailor Patrick Tate Adamec, who received a 20-year sentence due to alleged ATF misinterpretations of firearm parts. The content highlights the legal arguments surrounding the ATF's actions, Adamec's background as a Master at Arms and collector, and the upcoming appeal. It also promotes Attorneys On Retainer as a legal defense service.

This video provides an expert analysis from Armed Scholar regarding the Supreme Court's decision to deny emergency review in a case challenging New York's firearm permit requirements. The discussion details the legal proceedings, including the Second Circuit's ruling on mootness and the implications for Second Amendment challenges to permit systems nationwide. The content emphasizes the importance of understanding legal nuances to avoid unintended consequences for gun owners.

This video discusses the overturned conviction of Kayla Giles for second-degree murder by the Louisiana State Supreme Court. The ruling was based on an error in jury instructions regarding Louisiana's Stand Your Ground law and the aggressor doctrine. While the murder conviction was vacated, the obstruction of justice charge remains to be reconsidered. The case highlights the importance of proper legal representation and understanding self-defense laws.

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a federal ban on handgun sales to adults aged 18-20 in McCoy v. ATF. This ruling contradicts a lower court's decision that applied the Bruen standard, finding no historical tradition for such a ban. The appeals court relied on the 'infancy doctrine' and 19th-century laws to justify the restriction, potentially setting a dangerous precedent for future gun control challenges.

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals has withdrawn its opinion in US v. Peterson, which previously asserted that suppressors are not protected by the Second Amendment. This unprecedented move, influenced by a DOJ recommendation and advocacy from groups like the Firearms Policy Coalition, signals a potential shift in legal interpretation. The court is expected to issue a new opinion, with many anticipating it will recognize suppressors as protected arms, impacting future NFA regulations and taxation.