Videos tagged with Brady United

This video, presented by Colion Noir, an experienced firearms instructor, breaks down how statistics are used to manipulate public perception regarding gun violence. It emphasizes understanding absolute risk versus relative risk, highlighting how sensationalized headlines and data framing by anti-gun groups can distort the reality of firearm-related incidents. Noir encourages viewers to critically analyze data, understand the context of statistics, and recognize the emotional appeals used in political and media narratives.

This video critiques the perceived hypocrisy of gun control advocates and politicians regarding federalization of DC police. The speaker highlights how arguments used to restrict gun rights, such as public safety concerns and crime statistics, are selectively ignored or reinterpreted when applied to federal intervention in DC policing. The analysis focuses on the political reactions and stated justifications from figures like Jamie Raskin and Charles Allen, contrasting them with their previous stances on gun control and due process.

This video from Langley Outdoors Academy discusses a proposed amendment by Senator Chris Murphy to raise the tax stamp for suppressors under the Hearing Protection Act (HPA) from $0 to $1. The speaker, Braden Langley, analyzes this move as a sign of nervousness from gun control groups like Giffords and Brady United, suggesting they are using Murphy as a 'hail Mary' to avoid a complete zero tax. The amendment is framed as an incremental change indicating weakness and a potential attempt to insulate themselves from future lawsuits by establishing a precedent for taxation.

This video urges viewers to contact their senators to support the Hearing Protection Act, which aims to remove suppressors and short-barreled rifles from the National Firearms Act (NFA). The speaker emphasizes that these organizations are actively lobbying against this legislation and frames the NFA's current status as a tax. The call to action is to spread pro-Second Amendment information and advocate for suppressor removal, highlighting the potential for this to pass through reconciliation.

This video discusses the ongoing legislative battle surrounding the Hearing Protection Act (HPA) and the efforts by gun control organizations to prevent suppressors from being removed from the National Firearms Act (NFA). The speaker, Braden from Langley Outdoors Academy, analyzes statements from senators like Chuck Schumer, Mark Kelly, and Chris Murphy, refuting their claims about suppressors being primarily designed for crime and arguing against the necessity of rigorous background checks for their purchase. The video highlights the role of advocacy groups like Giffords.org and Moms Demand Action in opposing the HPA and urges viewers to contact their senators.

David Kopel discusses Mexico's lawsuit against U.S. firearms manufacturers, arguing it's an attempt to circumvent the Second Amendment and bankrupt the industry. He highlights the lawsuit's reliance on a questionable 'marketing loophole' within the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) and criticizes claims about easily removable serial numbers and patriotic engravings appealing to cartels. Kopel suggests anti-gun billionaires may be funding the legal costs.

Tennessee has passed GOA-sponsored legislation to expand its Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA). This bill strengthens existing state law, creating incentives for firearms businesses to relocate to Tennessee and preventing state courts from recognizing anti-gun judgments from foreign courts or other states. The legislation aims to shield the firearms industry from what GOA describes as 'business-ending lawfare' and frivolous lawsuits.

This video investigates claims that US taxpayer dollars are being funneled through intermediary organizations to fund major gun control advocacy groups, circumventing the Dickey Amendment. It highlights the role of organizations like Neo Philanthropy and presents data from the 'Data Republican' website to illustrate the alleged money trail from USAID grants to groups such as Everytown, Brady, Giffords, and March for Our Lives. The presenter argues this constitutes a form of government money laundering to support gun control efforts.

This video analyzes a Bloomberg Law article that, despite intending to criticize the Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC), is framed as a glowing endorsement. The FPC is highlighted for its relentless litigation against gun control measures across numerous states, its success in challenging laws, and its effective online presence. The article inadvertently showcases the FPC's strategic approach, its growing influence, and its ability to mobilize support, suggesting the gun control advocates' efforts are backfiring by strengthening the FPC's position and membership.

This video analyzes the lack of gun-related ballot measures in 2024, interpreting it as a sign of the gun control movement's struggles. It contrasts statements from gun control advocates like Christian Hayne of Brady United with those from gun rights organizations like the NRA Institute, highlighting the expansion of Second Amendment rights through state legislatures and court decisions. The video encourages viewers to register to vote via VoteWithBraden.com.

This video critiques the messaging and implementation of red flag laws, specifically highlighting a public service announcement from Brady United in collaboration with the Illinois Department of Public Health. The speaker argues that these laws are misrepresented as family conversations for suicide prevention, when in reality they involve government intervention, potentially leading to the confiscation of firearms without due process for extended periods. The video also touches on legal actions against firearm manufacturers by entities like Everytown Law.

This video analyzes rumors surrounding Kamala Harris's potential Vice Presidential pick, focusing on Arizona Senator Mark Kelly. The speaker argues that the selection of a candidate with a strong gun control record, like Kelly (husband of Gabby Giffords), would signal a "gun control ticket" aimed at leveraging the Second Amendment issue in the upcoming election. The analysis connects this potential VP choice with recent media narratives and the activities of gun control advocacy groups, suggesting a coordinated political strategy.