Videos tagged with Bruen Opinion

This video analyzes the Guns Save Life v. Kelly case in Illinois, which unsuccessfully challenged the state's FOID card law. William Kirk from Washington Gun Law explains how this ruling, combined with Bruen and Rahimi opinions, sets a precedent that could be used to uphold and implement other gun control legislation across various jurisdictions. The video aims to educate viewers on these legal developments and their potential impact on Second Amendment rights.

William Kirk of Washington Gun Law discusses how legal opinions and court decisions are being used to disarm citizens for political reasons, highlighting the complicity of the courts. He references an article from The Trace that, despite not intending to prove this point, provides data supporting the claim that judges are partisan in gun cases, particularly concerning the Bruen opinion. The video encourages viewers to educate themselves on these issues to protect their Second Amendment rights and stay informed about legislative and judicial actions affecting gun ownership.

The Ninth Circuit, in United States v. Duarte, has overturned a federal gun law, specifically 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), which prohibits felons from possessing firearms. This decision, influenced by the Bruen opinion, challenges the government's argument that felons are excluded from the Second Amendment's protection. The court applied a text and history framework, finding that Duarte's handgun qualifies as an 'arm' and his conduct falls within the Second Amendment's plain language. The government's assertion that felons are not part of 'the people' was rejected, citing Heller and Bruen.

William Kirk of Washington Gun Law analyzes the intersection of New York's Red Flag Laws with the Supreme Court's Bruen opinion, specifically in the context of the Gonyo v. D.S. case. The discussion highlights how courts are applying Bruen's two-step test to challenges against firearm restrictions, focusing on the definition of 'law-abiding citizen' and the necessity of due process before rights can be curtailed. This case sets a precedent for future legal battles over civilian disarmament legislation.

This video breaks down the Supreme Court case Range v. Garland, which challenges the federal law prohibiting individuals with non-violent felonies or misdemeanors from possessing firearms. The Third Circuit ruled this ban unconstitutional as applied to Brian Range, a man convicted of a non-violent misdemeanor for concealing income. The government is seeking Supreme Court review, arguing the decision undermines longstanding statutes and historical precedent regarding felon disarmament.

This expert analysis from William Kirk of Washington Gun Law explores the potential impact of the Miller v. Bonta case on Washington State's proposed HB 1240 assault weapon ban. Kirk details how a favorable ruling for gun owners in the Ninth Circuit, particularly from Judge Benitez, could render similar state bans unconstitutional, especially post-Bruen. The discussion highlights the critical timing of court rulings versus legislative action and the potential for injunctions against new firearm laws.

This expert-level analysis by William Kirk of Washington Gun Law breaks down the significance of the Bruen Supreme Court opinion. It clarifies how the ruling, authored by Justice Clarence Thomas, established a single-part test for Second Amendment challenges, emphasizing historical tradition over modern 'balancing tests' used by lower courts. The content highlights why Bruen is crucial for challenging current bans on firearms and magazines.

This video features William Kirk, President of Washington Gun Law, discussing the significant legal case Miller v. Bonta. This case challenges California's ban on semi-automatic assault rifles. Following the Supreme Court's Bruen opinion, supplemental briefing was filed, leading to a response from California that the video describes as 'desperate.' The discussion aims to educate viewers on the implications of this case for gun owners and their rights.

This video features constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith breaking down the unconstitutionality of "assault weapon" bans. Drawing on his expertise and legal scholarship, which has influenced court decisions, Smith explains the Second Amendment's protections regarding firearms. He discusses key legal concepts like "arms," "bearable," the government's burden of proof, and the common use standard for firearms. The video aims to educate gun owners on their rights and how to defend them, referencing the "four boxes" of American liberty. Further reading materials on common firearm ownership and legal opinions are provided.