This video features Mark W. Smith, a Constitutional Attorney and published author, discussing a new historical study by Dr. Angus McClellen. The study, released ahead of oral arguments in Koons v. Siegel at the Third Circuit, argues that 'sensitive places' gun bans are only constitutional if the government provides comprehensive security, such as armed guards and metal detectors. Historically, such places were secured by armed officials, and the research suggests that disarming citizens without guaranteed protection is unconstitutional.
This video analyzes a Wall Street Journal op-ed by a Stanford-affiliated professor who argued that Supreme Court justices are poor historians regarding the Second Amendment. Host Mark Smith, a constitutional attorney, debunks the professor's arguments, discussing the role of history in Second Amendment lawsuits, the "1328 Terrorism Law," the AR-15 and modern technology, and the distinction between individual versus collective rights. The analysis also touches on the influence of Cesare Beccaria.
This video, hosted by constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith, draws a parallel between historical philosophical arguments on societal control and modern discussions surrounding "gun violence." It critically examines the concept of "fire violence" by referencing an arson attack that resulted in 11 fatalities, contrasting it with mass casualty events involving firearms. The host argues that focusing solely on firearms as the cause of violence is a form of "propaganda," implicitly advocating for a broader perspective that includes the misuse of other tools or elements.
This video analyzes an op-ed by Chess Grandmaster Gary Kasparov, who argues for the necessity of firearms in defending rights, drawing a parallel to the situation in Ukraine. Constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith explains Kasparov's perspective on the Second Amendment, contrasting it with the "thoughts and prayers" approach and critiquing the anti-gun lobby's tactics. The discussion touches upon historical figures like Cesare Beccaria and emphasizes understanding the "four boxes" of American liberty.
This video discusses Illinois's legal argument for banning AR-15s, claiming their lethality justifies the ban under the Second Amendment. Constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith analyzes this argument, referencing Cesare Beccaria and historical context. The discussion touches on who decides which weapons are permissible for self-defense and whether such firearms are more effective for criminals. The content is presented by The Four Boxes Diner, focusing on Second Amendment news and analysis from an expert perspective.
This video features Mark W. Smith, a constitutional attorney and 2A scholar, presenting a five-question quiz on Second Amendment rights and firearm history. The quiz covers Founding Father quotes, historical firearms like the Girandoni air rifle, the meaning of 'AR' in AR-15, and historical arguments against gun control, highlighting the Founders' understanding of repeating firearms and the intent behind the Second Amendment.
This entry explores the profound, yet often overlooked, influence of 18th-century Italian criminologist Cesare Beccaria on the Second Amendment and broader American legal thought. Mark W. Smith, a Constitutional Attorney and Presidential Scholar, highlights how Beccaria's writings shaped the views of key Founding Fathers like Madison and Jefferson, particularly concerning the right to bear arms and the ineffectiveness of gun bans. The content emphasizes Beccaria's arguments against restrictive laws that disarm law-abiding citizens while leaving criminals armed, drawing parallels to modern self-defense scenarios.
You've reached the end! 7 videos loaded.
Gun Laws by State
Read firearms regulations for all 50 states + D.C.
Find Gun Dealers
Search licensed FFL dealers near you.