Videos tagged with Colorado Supreme Court

This video critically examines Colorado's proposed Senate Bill 25003, focusing on its potential impact on Second Amendment rights. Experts discuss mandated training for firearm purchases, the implications of red flag laws bypassing due process, and the shift from 'shall issue' to 'may issue' concealed carry permits. The conversation highlights concerns about government overreach, potential for bias in law enforcement discretion, and the effectiveness of proposed gun control measures in enhancing public safety.

This video analyzes the legal and constitutional arguments surrounding the eligibility of Donald Trump to appear on the 2024 presidential ballot, following challenges in Maine and Colorado. Professor Mark Smith, a constitutional attorney, delves into the historical context and legal standards, including the 14th Amendment and First Amendment issues (specifically referencing Brandenburg v. Ohio), as well as the concept of insurrection. The video also touches on perceived political motivations and the potential outcomes of these legal battles. The content is presented by the "Four Boxes Diner," which focuses on Second Amendment news and analysis, with the host's background in constitutional law and firearm-related advocacy highlighted.

This YouTube Short discusses the Colorado Supreme Court and its implications, referencing the constitution and aiming to provide truth. The description also promotes a WPS app for shows and training, directing viewers to their website and app stores. While the title and description focus on a legal and political topic, the inclusion of #constitution and the overall context of promoting a platform that offers training hints at a potential connection to rights and legal discussions surrounding firearms.

This YouTube Short discusses the legal removal of Donald Trump from Colorado's ballot by state-level Supreme Courts, framing it as a new development in the ongoing political landscape. The title uses a hashtag referencing 'shortsfeed,' indicating it's intended for short-form video content.

This video analyzes the Colorado Supreme Court's decision to deem Donald Trump ineligible for the presidency under the Fourteenth Amendment. Constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith breaks down the legal and constitutional arguments for a Second Amendment audience, referencing scholarly work by Professor Josh Blackman and Seth Tillman. The discussion covers the court's findings, the proposed remedy, and a textual argument regarding the disqualification.

This episode of ARFCOM News discusses legal challenges and legislative developments impacting Second Amendment rights. It covers lawsuits against Virginia for alleged illegal background checks and a handgun-a-month law, highlights Indiana's elimination of gun permit fees, and analyzes the Colorado Supreme Court's ruling on magazine capacity bans. The segment also addresses proposed legislation targeting 'ghost guns' and the manufacturing of firearm components, alongside news about Remington's financial troubles and a new 80% Glock-compatible frame from Strike Industries.

The Colorado Supreme Court ruled that the University of Colorado's campus gun ban violates state law, specifically the 2003 Concealed Carry Act. This decision, represented by attorney Jim Manley, means the ban is not officially gone yet but requires further action in the trial court to be fully rescinded. The court did not need to address Second Amendment issues as the ban was struck down based on statutory grounds.

This video discusses oral arguments before the Colorado Supreme Court regarding the University of Colorado's ban on campus carry. Attorney Jim Manley, representing Students for Concealed Carry, argues that the Colorado Concealed Carry Act permits carrying in all areas of the state not specifically excluded, and universities are not on that exclusion list. The university's argument that 'all areas of the state' does not include universities is presented as legally outdated.