This video analyzes a dangerous argument presented in an amicus brief by the Brady and Giffords groups in the Kipy v. Moore case before the Fourth Circuit. The argument posits that the First and Second Amendments cannot coexist, suggesting that the mere presence of firearms inhibits First Amendment activities like free speech and assembly. This reasoning, if adopted, could lead to widespread disarmament by expanding the definition of 'sensitive places' to nearly any location where First Amendment activities occur, ultimately arguing that disarming citizens is necessary to preserve democracy.
You've reached the end! 1 videos loaded.
Gun Laws by State
Read firearms regulations for all 50 states + D.C.
Find Gun Dealers
Search licensed FFL dealers near you.