Videos tagged with First Amendment

The Yankee Marshal channel is actively supporting the 'Pets and Vets' program through various giveaways. Viewers can enter to win a Kahr 25th Anniversary K9 by donating to the program via SubscribeStar, with tiered entry levels based on donation amount. Additionally, custom grips, including unique Rat Fink designs for a CZ 75, and Spyderco knives (including 'zombie green' variants) are being given away to supporters and active chat participants. The channel also promotes merchandise and emphasizes support for the Second Amendment and the Constitution.

This video discusses the dangers of social media pranks that create chaos and fear, particularly for gun owners. It emphasizes the importance of situational awareness and the split-second decisions gun owners may face when confronted with such situations. The speaker highlights the potential legal and psychological consequences of reacting to a perceived threat that turns out to be a prank.

This video analyzes the Supreme Court's ruling in Charles v. Salazar, arguing it significantly impacts future Second Amendment cases, particularly those involving AR-15 bans. Host Mark Smith, a constitutional attorney and Second Amendment advocate, explains how the Court's rejection of Colorado's attempt to redefine speech as conduct sets a precedent against states using arbitrary labels to ban firearms. The ruling suggests the Supreme Court will scrutinize the definitions of 'assault weapon' and 'large capacity magazine' used by anti-gun jurisdictions.

This video discusses a class-action lawsuit filed against the U.S. government under the Federal Tort Claims Act, alleging excessive and indiscriminate force by law enforcement on January 6th. The lawsuit claims police used chemical munitions and projectiles without proper warnings, leading to injuries and violating citizens' First Amendment rights. It highlights potential implications for government power and accountability.

Assembly Bill 2047 in California proposes to place 3D printers under Department of Justice control by requiring them to incorporate firearm blueprint detection algorithms and blocking technology. This bill aims to prevent the creation of 3D-printed firearm parts, but critics argue it infringes on First Amendment rights, creates undue burdens on manufacturers and retailers, and may not effectively deter criminals while hindering legitimate technological advancements. The legislation is seen by some as a fundraising effort by anti-gun groups.

This video discusses a significant Supreme Court ruling (8-1 decision) in favor of the First Amendment's protection of free speech, specifically in the context of licensed professionals. The case involved a Colorado law that restricted a mental health counselor's ability to advise clients against gender transition. The Supreme Court, in an opinion authored by Justice Gorsuch, affirmed that professional licensing does not negate an individual's right to free speech, particularly when the state attempts to enforce viewpoint discrimination. This ruling has broad implications for various professions, including those who advocate for Second Amendment rights.

A federal court has struck down a California law restricting firearm advertising, ruling it violated the First Amendment. The state is ordered to pay nearly half a million dollars in attorney's fees to the NRA. This decision highlights the link between the First and Second Amendments and sets a precedent against regulating speech related to constitutionally protected products.

This video from Gun Owners of America (GOA) argues that the Second Amendment is crucial for protecting First Amendment rights, particularly free speech. It uses examples from Europe and Australia to illustrate how disarmed populations are more susceptible to government overreach and restrictions on expression. GOA highlights its legal battles against the ATF and various state governments to defend the right to bear arms, especially in the context of protests and the distribution of information related to firearms.

This entry details a legal and political battle over custom license plates in Florida, initiated by Gun For Hire. The speaker, an expert with significant experience in firearm instruction and advocacy, recounts the denial and subsequent approval of a 'GUN4HIRE' license plate in Florida after initial rejection in Tallahassee. The narrative highlights the perceived erosion of rights and critiques political spending priorities, drawing parallels to situations in New Jersey and Virginia.

This video discusses the legal battles surrounding the distribution of computer code for 3D printing firearms and firearm components. It highlights lawsuits filed by California Attorney General Rob Bonta against companies like Gatalog Foundation and Control Pew LLC, and a counter-suit filed by Control Pew. The core issue revolves around whether computer code for 3D printing constitutes protected speech under the First Amendment, with a recent Third Circuit case (Defense Distributed v. New Jersey AG) suggesting that purely functional code without expressive use may not be protected.

This video from Clint Morgan, an experienced firearms instructor, clarifies common misconceptions about the Second Amendment. Morgan emphasizes that the right to bear arms, like other constitutional rights such as freedom of speech, is not diminished by technological advancements. He argues that the principle behind the right remains constant, regardless of how technology evolves.

This video discusses a significant US Supreme Court ruling that vindicated Judge Roger Benitez's injunction against California policies that prevented schools from notifying parents about their children's gender transitioning. The court's decision emphasizes parental rights, particularly concerning religious objections and the right to raise children as parents see fit, citing the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment and the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The ruling highlights the importance of parental involvement in a child's life and criticizes policies that exclude parents from critical information.