!!AB 2047 Could Put California 3D Printers Under DOJ Control!!

This video discusses the Supreme Court's decision to overturn the Chevron Doctrine, which previously granted deference to federal agencies' interpretations of statutes. CRPA President Chuck Michelle explains how this impacts agencies like the ATF, potentially limiting their ability to enact regulations without clear statutory authority. The discussion also covers recent SCOTUS decisions on Second Amendment cases, including the denial of cert in Illinois gun ban cases and the GVR (Grant, Vacate, Remand) of cases in light of the Rahimi decision, signaling a shift in how gun rights litigation may proceed.

This video discusses President Trump's executive order aimed at reviewing and potentially reversing actions that infringe upon Second Amendment rights. CRPA Legislative Director Rick Travis breaks down the order's implications, focusing on the Department of Justice's role in examining regulations from the Biden administration, particularly concerning 'ghost guns' and age restrictions. The discussion also touches upon the potential impact of the order on ongoing Second Amendment litigation and the role of states like California in challenging federal actions.

This video provides an expert overview of key California firearm laws and regulations taking effect in 2025 and beyond, presented by attorney Matt Cabero. It details changes to firearm storage requirements, the impact of the ammunition tax, and updates to CCW permit processes. The discussion highlights the efforts of organizations like CRPA in shaping legislation and regulatory outcomes.

This video discusses two lawsuits challenging California laws that prohibit firearm sales at state-owned properties, specifically targeting gun shows at the Del Mar Fairgrounds and OC Fair and Event Center. The discussion highlights the legal arguments presented at the Ninth Circuit, focusing on Second and First Amendment rights, and the impact of the Bruin decision on the analysis of such restrictions. The speaker, an attorney involved in the cases, details the contrasting outcomes in the lower courts and the challenges faced during oral arguments before a seemingly hostile panel.