This video analyzes a significant concession made by the Department of Justice (DOJ) during the Rahimi oral argument before the Supreme Court. Constitutional attorney Mark Smith explains how this admission, particularly from Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar, could be used to thwart future 'assault weapon' bans, semi-automatic rifle bans, magazine capacity limits, and potentially suppressor bans. The core of the argument rests on the legal doctrine of estoppel, which binds the DOJ to its stated positions, and the precedent set by Heller and Bruen regarding the 'common use' test for firearm regulation.
You've reached the end! 1 videos loaded.
Gun Laws by State
Read firearms regulations for all 50 states + D.C.
Find Gun Dealers
Search licensed FFL dealers near you.
