This video analyzes the legal arguments presented in the Range v. Garland case following the Supreme Court's decision in US v. Rahimi. The attorneys for Brian Range argue that the Rahimi decision, which focused on violent individuals, does not support the permanent disarmament of nonviolent felons. The analysis highlights the Bruen methodology, emphasizing the text, tradition, and burden-shifting framework for Second Amendment cases, and dissects historical laws like 'Shit Laws' and 'Affray Laws' to argue against broad interpretations of firearm restrictions for nonviolent offenses.
You've reached the end! 1 videos loaded.
Gun Laws by State
Read firearms regulations for all 50 states + D.C.
Find Gun Dealers
Search licensed FFL dealers near you.
