Videos tagged with Felon in Possession

This video discusses a significant Second Amendment victory in the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit concerning federal felon-in-possession laws, specifically 18 USC 922(g)(1). The ruling, authored by Judge James Ho, challenges the historical basis for disarming individuals convicted of non-violent offenses, emphasizing that modern 'malum prohibitum' crimes should not automatically lead to lifetime disarmament without historical precedent. The case of Edward Cockerham, disarmed for failing to pay child support, is used as a prime example.

This video discusses a significant legal development in the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals concerning federal gun laws. The court has taken over a case challenging 18 USC Sec. 922(g)(1), the federal prohibition on felons possessing firearms. This follows a similar move in a case challenging the New Jersey assault weapon ban. The speaker, William Kirk of Washington Gun Law, suggests the 3rd Circuit is becoming a central battleground for Second Amendment litigation.

This video discusses Zherka v. Bondi, a significant Supreme Court case challenging the federal prohibition on firearm possession by felons (18 USC 922(g)(1)). The central question revolves around whether non-violent felons should be permanently disarmed. The presenter, William Kirk of Washington Gun Law, highlights the lack of circuit court consensus and the need for Supreme Court resolution. The discussion explores the possibility of the DOJ supporting the petition and the potential for a definitive ruling on this issue, aiming to educate viewers on their Second Amendment rights.

This video discusses a significant Second Amendment victory concerning the 'Felon in Possession' law, specifically the Third Circuit US Court of Appeals ruling in Brian Range vs. the Federal Government. The court determined that a conviction for food stamp fraud, a non-violent misdemeanor, should not strip an individual of their Second Amendment rights, especially when no jail time was served. This ruling emphasizes that historical tradition does not support disarming individuals for minor, decades-old offenses.

The Supreme Court's 8-1 decision in Range v. Garland has been interpreted by the Third Circuit as striking down federal law prohibiting non-violent felons from possessing firearms, as applied to Mr. Range's specific conviction. The ruling emphasizes that individuals, even those with certain past convictions, remain 'the people' protected by the Second Amendment unless the government can demonstrate historical precedent for such a permanent ban. This decision opens the door for further 'as applied' challenges against Section 922 G1, particularly concerning non-violent offenses.

This video details the FBI's arrest of Earl Carter Jr., known as the "AK Guru," on federal charges related to manufacturing and selling hundreds of machine guns and illegal suppressors. The investigation was initiated by a confidential informant who purchased illegal firearms from Carter. The report highlights Carter's prior felony conviction for discharging a firearm into an occupied building, making him prohibited from owning firearms. The narrative questions the legality and constitutionality of current firearm regulations, particularly concerning machine guns and the licensing requirements for manufacturing.

This video analyzes a major Second Amendment legal battle concerning the possession of firearms by non-violent felons. The US Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit heard oral arguments in this significant case. Mark Smith of Four Boxes Diner, a constitutional attorney with extensive experience in Second Amendment law and a background as a Supreme Court Bar member, professor, and media commentator, breaks down the current state of the law, the case's background, the original decision, and the timeline. He offers his predictions and a summary of the arguments, including the role of historical analogues. The analysis aims to inform viewers about the "four boxes" of American liberty and defend their rights.

This video provides an expert-level breakdown of the Supreme Court's 8-1 decision in United States v. Rahimi and its implications for the Range v. Garland case. The speaker, an experienced firearms instructor and legal analyst, explains how Rahimi upheld federal firearm prohibitions for those under domestic violence restraining orders, while Range challenges the permanent disarmament of individuals with non-violent felony convictions. The analysis highlights the distinction between temporary and permanent disarmament and the ongoing legal arguments regarding historical tradition and the scope of Second Amendment rights.

This video breaks down a significant Second Amendment legal development. A pro-2A brief has been filed in the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, arguing for the right of non-violent felon Bryan Range to keep and bear arms, challenging the existing law 18 USC 922g1. Legal analyst Mark Smith of Four Boxes Diner provides an in-depth analysis of this crucial legal submission, referencing the Supreme Court's Rahimi decision and its implications for firearm rights. The video also touches upon surety laws and the potential for a death sentence issue, with the host offering a personal prediction on the case's outcome.

This YouTube video features constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith analyzing and predicting the US Supreme Court's decisions on Second Amendment cases, specifically highlighting the upcoming US v. Rahimi case and its implications for "prohibited persons" regulations under federal gun control law (18 USC 922g). Smith, a Supreme Court Bar member and frequent Fox News guest, delves into how these rulings might affect gun ownership rights, discussing categories of "convicted felons," drug offenders, and the controversial "red flag" laws. The content aims to inform gun owners about their constitutional rights and potential legal challenges.

This video discusses the legal case of US v. Duarte, a challenge to the federal law 18 USC Sec. 922(g)(1) which prohibits felons from possessing firearms. Washington Gun Law President, William Kirk, explains that while a panel initially ruled in favor of the challenge, the United States has appealed to the full 9th Circuit. The appeal is viewed as potentially unfavorable for Second Amendment rights. The video encourages viewers to educate themselves on the issue and provides links to the DOJ Appellate Brief and other resources from Washington Gun Law.

This video discusses a federal appeals court ruling that a felon-in-possession of a firearm law violates the Second Amendment. While the title focuses on this legal development, the description includes unrelated links to "Woobie Blankets" and "UnGovernable" shirts. The video creator also shares affiliate links for various products, their email list, Patreon, and organizations like Gun Owners of America and Firearms Policy Coalition. The description also lists their video production equipment. The content seems to be primarily legal and Second Amendment focused, with commercial promotion of unrelated merchandise.