Videos tagged with Duncan v. Bonta

This video provides an in-depth analysis of the Duncan v. Bonta lawsuit challenging California's ban on standard-capacity magazines. It details the legal journey through various court levels, including the Ninth Circuit's en banc review and the potential path to the Supreme Court. The discussion highlights the application of the Bruen decision's methodology to Second Amendment cases and the strategic implications of procedural maneuvers in firearms litigation.

This video discusses the reasons behind Judge Benitez's delay in issuing rulings on California's assault weapon and magazine bans. The speaker, an "Armed Scholar," posits that the complexity of applying the Bruin decision, the need for thorough historical analysis, and the interconnectedness of multiple high-profile cases are contributing factors. The video emphasizes that any ruling will likely face appeals, making the legal process lengthy.

This video analyzes the legal case Duncan v. Bonta, focusing on California's ban of magazines holding over 10 rounds. The argument presented by California is that new social dangers, like mass shootings, justify the ban, despite these not existing during the Founding era. The video, featuring constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith, argues that this reasoning fundamentally misunderstands US history and the intent of the Second Amendment. It explores the historical context of mass killings and the Founders' responses to such events. The content is presented by The Four Boxes Diner, a platform for Second Amendment news and analysis.

This video discusses the legal case "Duncan v. Bonta" (previously "Duncan v. Becerra") and its journey through the court system, from the Supreme Court back to a District Court. The content focuses on the legal and legislative aspects surrounding firearms in California, specifically concerning Second Amendment rights and gun control measures. The description links to resources from CRPA and Michel & Associates, indicating a strong emphasis on legal advocacy and analysis related to gun laws.

This YouTube video provides an update on the Duncan v. Bonta case, highlighting the actions of Judge Benitez. The description encourages viewers to visit CRPA.org for more information, suggesting a focus on legal and legislative aspects related to firearms rights. The use of hashtags like #secondamendment, #legislation, and #judge indicates the video's content will be centered around legal challenges and interpretations affecting gun ownership.

This video provides an update on the Duncan v. Bonta magazine ban lawsuit, highlighting that Judge Benitez has regained control of the case. The content encourages support for the CRPA (California Rifle and Pistol Association) and includes various affiliate links for products such as pre-workout, merchandise, health optimization services, body armor, and coffee. The video also mentions a mailbox for mail submissions.

This video provides an expert analysis of the GOA's amicus brief to the Supreme Court regarding California's magazine ban, specifically the Duncan v Bonta case. It details the legal arguments against the Ninth Circuit's two-step analysis and the rejection of interest-balancing tests, highlighting concerns raised by Supreme Court justices. The content emphasizes the potential impact of the upcoming NYSRPA v. Bruen decision on Second Amendment jurisprudence.

This video discusses the ongoing legal challenge to California's magazine ban in the Duncan v. Bonta Supreme Court case. The content focuses on the legal aspects of firearm rights and potential impacts on magazine legality. The description also includes affiliate links for various products, including body armor, supplements, merchandise, health services, and coffee.

This video discusses the legal developments surrounding magazine bans, specifically referencing the Duncan v. Bonta court case. An unopposed motion to stay the mandate from the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has been granted, putting the magazine ban case on hold pending a potential appeal to the Supreme Court. The video also includes promotional links for health optimization services, supplements, apparel, and concealable body armor.

This video provides a critical update on the Duncan v. Bonta legal case concerning California's ban on high-capacity magazines. While an initial ruling by Judge Benitez found the ban unconstitutional, the Ninth Circuit has intervened, applying intermediate scrutiny. This means California can potentially ban magazines without proving a direct impact on their stated goals, raising concerns about the right to bear arms. The current status is that legally possessed magazines are unaffected, but the legal landscape is fluid, with potential future mandates and ongoing Supreme Court reviews influencing the outcome.

This video features an interview with Chuck Michel from the California Rifle and Pistol Association discussing Joe Biden's push for gun control. The conversation centers on the 9th Circuit court's oral arguments regarding California's magazine ban in the case of Duncan v. Bonta. Michel provides insights into the legal proceedings and the implications for Second Amendment rights in California.

This video provides an update on the Miller v. Bonta legal case, stating that it has been stayed pending the resolution of Rupp v. Bonta, which in turn is awaiting the outcome of Duncan v. Bonta. The video directs viewers to a Reddit post for more information and links to the video creator's Odysee channel, merchandise, and support pages. It also promotes concealable body armor with a discount code and encourages viewers to join the USCCA for post-gunfight protection.