Videos tagged with Three Judge Panel

This video discusses the issue of 'rogue judges' issuing nationwide injunctions, particularly in the context of political motivations. It analyzes House Resolution 1526, the 'No Rogue Rulings Act,' which aims to restrict district courts from issuing nationwide injunctions unless specific criteria are met, such as cases brought by multiple states in different circuits. The speaker cautions that while such legislation might seem beneficial, it could have unintended consequences if the political climate shifts, potentially hindering the ability to obtain nationwide injunctions for self-defense purposes.

This video discusses the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals' decision to stay Judge Bonta's order against California's magazine capacity ban in Duncan v. Bonta. The speaker highlights the Ninth Circuit's unusual request for parties to brief whether the en banc panel had the statutory authority to hear the appeal, suggesting it's a delay tactic. The analysis suggests this could lead to further delays by potentially sending the case back to a three-judge panel.

This video provides an in-depth analysis of the Duncan v. Bonta lawsuit challenging California's ban on standard-capacity magazines. It details the legal journey through various court levels, including the Ninth Circuit's en banc review and the potential path to the Supreme Court. The discussion highlights the application of the Bruen decision's methodology to Second Amendment cases and the strategic implications of procedural maneuvers in firearms litigation.