How They've Slowly Disarmed America and the Case to Stop It

This video discusses the significant Supreme Court case Zurka v. Bondi, which challenges the federal prohibition on firearm possession for individuals convicted of non-violent felonies under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). The case highlights a circuit split on whether this law is constitutional as applied, particularly for those whose past offenses do not demonstrate dangerousness. The discussion emphasizes the potential impact on thousands of Americans seeking to restore their Second Amendment rights.

This video provides an in-depth analysis of cases concerning Second Amendment rights before the Supreme Court. It details 'the group of five' critical cases, including challenges to magazine and assault weapon bans, and highlights new cases like 'Gardner v. Maryland' addressing interstate travel with firearms and 'Peterson v. United States' challenging the NFA. The speaker, William Kirk of Washington Gun Law, emphasizes the importance of understanding these legal developments for gun owners.

This video from Washington Gun Law TV, hosted by William Kirk, analyzes why many believe the Supreme Court disregards Second Amendment rights. It examines the court's handling of cases like Wolford v. Lopez and Shenenthal v. Raul, focusing on how the court manages its caseload and the implications for Second Amendment jurisprudence. The discussion highlights the court's decisions on place and people restrictions, suggesting a pattern of rejecting cases that could clarify or strengthen gun rights.

This video discusses the Ninth Circuit's en banc review of the United States v. Duarte case, which previously struck down 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) as unconstitutional as applied to a felon. The Department of Justice is appealing this decision, arguing that felons are not protected by the Second Amendment and that prior case law like United States v. Vong remains valid post-Bruen. The potential for a circuit split is highlighted as a factor increasing the likelihood of Supreme Court review.

This video from Washington Gun Law TV, hosted by William Kirk, argues that the historical origins of gun control legislation in the United States are rooted in racism. It highlights how proponents of civilian disarmament, even those claiming to represent minority interests, have historically employed racist arguments and laws to advance their agenda. The discussion centers on the Ninth Circuit's ruling in *US v. Dewarte* and its application by New Mexico in the *Ortega v. Lujan Gisham* case to justify statutory waiting periods.

This video features an impassioned rant from 'Scruff Limba' of Langley Outdoors Academy, who identifies himself as an expert in gun rights. He criticizes the narrative surrounding gun control, using a recent shooting in Norfolk, Virginia, as a case study. The speaker argues that focusing on gun rights distracts from the real issues of violent ideologies and failures in the justice system, particularly concerning individuals with criminal histories and ties to extremist groups.

William Kirk, President of Washington Gun Law and a practicing attorney, provides expert guidance on how to legally respond if your vehicle is surrounded by a mob. He emphasizes understanding the nuances of self-defense laws, particularly concerning the use of force, and stresses that the primary goal should always be de-escalation and safe escape when possible. The instruction highlights the critical difference between property damage and threats to human life when justifying defensive actions.

This video, featuring legal expert William Kirk, delves into the complex legalities of using deadly force against law enforcement officers when faced with unlawful aggression. It clarifies the foundational principles of self-defense, including necessity, reasonableness, and proportionality, and outlines the four legal justifications for employing lethal force. The discussion highlights the protections afforded by the Castle Doctrine and Stand Your Ground laws, particularly within one's home, and differentiates between the legal right to self-defense and the tactical considerations of engaging with law enforcement.

This video features William Kirk, President of Washington Gun Law, an expert in firearms law, discussing the growing trend of county sheriffs and state associations opposing federal gun control measures. The primary focus is on Arkansas, detailing Act 1012 and Arkansas Code 21-1-904, which aim to prevent state cooperation with federal enforcement of certain firearms regulations, particularly the ATF's rule on pistol stabilizing braces.

William Kirk, President of Washington Gun Law, provides expert insights into ATF firearm inspection authority. He clarifies that the ATF cannot demand inspections of non-NFA firearms or NFA items without a warrant, dispelling common misconceptions about Fourth Amendment rights for firearm owners. The video emphasizes that FFLs have different inspection rules than private citizens.