Videos tagged with 18 USC 922G1

The Supreme Court's 8-1 decision in Range v. Bondi (formerly Range v. Garland) has been deemed unconstitutional regarding federal laws prohibiting non-violent felons from possessing firearms. The DOJ has decided not to challenge this ruling, allowing it to stand. This, coupled with a new DOJ rule change, opens avenues for restoring federal gun rights for individuals with non-violent felony convictions. The decision is considered narrow, focusing on specific circumstances like Brian Range's decades-old food stamp fraud conviction.

This video details a significant legal victory for the Second Amendment community, specifically concerning the 'Felon in Possession' law. The Third Circuit US Court of Appeals ruled in favor of Brian Range, who challenged the federal ban on firearm possession following a misdemeanor conviction for food stamp fraud. The court determined that such a minor, non-violent offense, committed decades ago, should not strip an individual of their constitutional right to self-defense, especially when no jail time was served. This ruling emphasizes the importance of historical tradition and the protection of law-abiding citizens under the Second Amendment, particularly after the Supreme Court's Bruen decision.

This video analyzes a significant ruling by the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit regarding federal gun control statute 18 USC 922g1. Constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith breaks down the court's decision, which determined the statute should not apply to a non-violent felon. The analysis covers the constitutional questions surrounding 'The People,' 'Arms' (not limited to just guns), the definition of 'Felonies,' and who bears the burden of proof in such cases. The content is presented from the perspective of The Four Boxes Diner, a platform focused on Second Amendment news and analysis.