Videos tagged with Firearm Possession

This video discusses Rhode Island House Bill 8073, which proposes to add 'possess' to the state's existing assault weapon ban. If passed, this would criminalize possession of previously legal firearms, with penalties up to 10 years in prison and a $10,000 fine. The bill mandates dispossessing prohibited firearms by December 31st, 2026, without compensation, raising concerns about Fifth and Second Amendment violations.

Tennessee has enacted new legislation, Senate Bill 350 and House Bill 469, which significantly alters landlord-tenant relations regarding firearms. Effective July 1st, landlords can no longer prohibit tenants from possessing, carrying, or storing firearms and ammunition within rental properties, including inside the residence, vehicle, parking areas, and common access points. This law voids existing lease clauses that ban firearms and provides tenants with legal recourse, including damages and attorney fees, if landlords violate these rights. The legislation asserts that constitutional rights do not cease at lease agreements, establishing a precedent that property rights do not supersede fundamental rights.

This video discusses recent gun bill developments in Tennessee, focusing on a new law that prohibits landlords from forbidding tenants from possessing firearms or ammunition on their property. It also touches upon a proposed bill concerning the use of deadly force to protect personal property and the implications for Second Amendment rights. The speaker emphasizes the significance of these legislative changes for gun owners in Tennessee.

This video from Washington Gun Law provides a critical analysis of Virginia's recent legislative session, detailing numerous bills that significantly impact firearm ownership and rights. Expert William Kirk breaks down specific legislation, including assault weapon bans, magazine capacity restrictions, and new liability standards for FFLs, highlighting the potential erosion of Second Amendment freedoms in the state. The content serves as a warning and a call to action for firearm owners in Virginia.

This video from Hegshot87 provides an expert-level analysis of the proposed strict gun ban in Virginia, potentially making millions of gun owners felons overnight. The speaker, demonstrating deep knowledge of legislative processes and legal precedents, details the specific firearm features targeted by bills SB217 and SB749, the ban on standard-capacity magazines, and the severe penalties for violations. It highlights the critical importance of state-level elections in protecting Second Amendment rights, referencing past gubernatorial vetoes and current legal challenges under the 4th Circuit's jurisdiction.

This video from Copper Jacket TV, featuring an expert speaker, details the complex legal hurdles Governor Gavin Newsom faces in possessing a SIG Sauer pistol gifted to him. The analysis highlights how California's stringent gun laws, many enacted or supported by Newsom himself, create a bureaucratic maze for firearm ownership, even for the state's governor. The speaker emphasizes the irony of the situation, suggesting it reflects the difficulties faced by ordinary citizens seeking to exercise their Second Amendment rights.

This video discusses the Supreme Court case United States v. Hmani, which challenges federal prohibitions on firearm possession by unlawful drug users (18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3)). The discussion centers on oral arguments and potential outcomes, with experts analyzing how the justices might rule based on their questions. The core issue is whether current drug use, specifically marijuana, constitutes a basis for disarming individuals under historical interpretations of gun rights and the Second Amendment.

This video discusses the Supreme Court case United States v. Hammani, which addresses whether the Second Amendment permits banning habitual marijuana users from possessing firearms under federal law (18 USC 922(g)(3)). The speaker, a constitutional attorney, critiques the Trump administration's decision to bring this case with unfavorable facts, arguing it could lead to unfavorable precedent. The analysis delves into historical legal traditions regarding disarming individuals deemed dangerous, drawing parallels to 'common drunkards' and 'lunatics' from the founding era.

This video explains the significant legal risks associated with the Gun Free School Zones Act (GFSZA), 18 USC 922Q, highlighting how it can turn lawful firearm possession into a federal felony, even in constitutional carry states. It details the 1000-foot radius rule, the interstate commerce hook used for federal jurisdiction, and common scenarios like traffic stops that can lead to prosecution. The content also touches upon NFA regulations regarding suppressors and the impact of the Bruen decision on sensitive places.

This video details a concerning incident where a law-abiding citizen, Jarrett Franco Modica, was arrested and jailed for legally purchasing a firearm that was later discovered to have been reported stolen years prior due to a police clerical error. Speaker Colion Noir, an expert in gun rights and legal analysis, breaks down the systemic failures, the legal ramifications for the gun owner, and the lack of recourse for citizens caught in such 'compliance traps.' The narrative emphasizes the critical importance of meticulous record-keeping for all firearm purchases.

This video discusses the implications of varying state gun laws, particularly focusing on the challenges faced by law-abiding citizens carrying firearms across state lines. The speaker expresses concern over statements made by Janine Piro regarding firearm possession in Washington D.C. and advocates for national reciprocity to ensure Second Amendment rights are not diminished by state borders. The discussion also touches upon legislative efforts to protect tenants' rights to possess firearms and critiques current political stances on gun control.

This video critically examines several high-profile incidents where individuals were killed by law enforcement, often with the presence or perceived presence of a firearm being used as justification. It highlights concerns about qualified immunity, inconsistent application of force, and the potential erosion of Second Amendment rights when legally armed citizens face lethal force without clear provocation. The discussion emphasizes the need for greater transparency and accountability in law enforcement actions.