Videos tagged with Assault Weapon Ban

This video analyzes a Trump-era DOJ lawsuit against Washington D.C.'s semi-automatic rifle ban, focusing on its potential to reshape AR-15 laws nationwide. The lawsuit challenges the ban by arguing AR-15 style rifles are commonly owned and protected under the Second Amendment, leveraging a federal civil rights statute typically used for police misconduct. This strategy could provide a blueprint for challenging similar bans in states like California, Illinois, New York, and Maryland, potentially leading to broader legal battles and even Supreme Court review.

This video details how specific firearm configurations, including AR-15s, AKs, tactical pistols, tactical shotguns, AR pistols, and 80% builds, are facing increased legal restrictions in various US states heading into 2026. It highlights new state laws and effective dates that impose training requirements, ban sales, or redefine prohibited features, making ownership more complex and potentially illegal depending on the state and firearm's specific configuration.

This video provides an in-depth analysis of cases concerning Second Amendment rights before the Supreme Court. It details 'the group of five' critical cases, including challenges to magazine and assault weapon bans, and highlights new cases like 'Gardner v. Maryland' addressing interstate travel with firearms and 'Peterson v. United States' challenging the NFA. The speaker, William Kirk of Washington Gun Law, emphasizes the importance of understanding these legal developments for gun owners.

The Department of Justice's Civil Rights Division, specifically the Second Amendment Unit led by Harmy Dylan, is actively challenging state-level firearms bans. Dylan asserts that semi-automatic rifles like the AR-15 are constitutionally protected under Supreme Court precedent, citing the Bruen decision. The DOJ is prepared to file lawsuits against unconstitutional legislation, such as the proposed ban in Virginia, and is also scrutinizing laws impacting ghost guns and manufacturer liability.

This video discusses significant legislative developments in Virginia concerning Second Amendment rights. It details potential impacts of Senate Bill 749 and House Bill 217, focusing on assault weapon bans and magazine restrictions, and the governor's decision-making deadline. The content also addresses House Bill 40, which bans unserialized and untraceable firearms, and the process for serializing them. The potential for a Department of Justice lawsuit against the state is also a key point of discussion.

This video discusses Rhode Island House Bill 8073, which proposes to add 'possess' to the state's existing assault weapon ban. If passed, this would criminalize possession of previously legal firearms, with penalties up to 10 years in prison and a $10,000 fine. The bill mandates dispossessing prohibited firearms by December 31st, 2026, without compensation, raising concerns about Fifth and Second Amendment violations.

This video analyzes a significant legal challenge brought by the U.S. Department of Justice against the District of Columbia's restrictive gun laws, specifically targeting its firearms registration scheme, assault weapon ban, and magazine limits. The analysis highlights the DOJ's assertion that these laws violate Second Amendment rights and discusses the legal basis for the DOJ's action under 34 U.S.C. § 12601, emphasizing the potential for a seismic shift in how federal authorities address state and local gun control measures.

This video discusses the importance of staying informed about gun laws and advocating for Second Amendment rights. The speaker highlights efforts in Connecticut to pass anti-gun bills and the unconstitutionality of New York's requirement for social media submissions for carry permits. It also touches on New Jersey's strict gun laws, including the ban on hollow-point ammunition and magazine capacity restrictions. The overall message emphasizes proactive engagement with lawmakers and vigilance in protecting gun rights.

This ARFCOM News episode covers a trademark dispute between B&T USA and B&T AG, clarifying that core B&T firearms are Swiss-made, with only suppressors manufactured in the US due to ATF regulations. It also debunks misinformation regarding the effectiveness of the 1994 assault weapon ban, citing research that shows no significant impact on crime rates. The segment highlights the importance of accurate information in firearms discourse and touches on the unique 'un-bullpupped AUG' build.

This video analyzes recent legislative efforts in Rhode Island to ban firearm possession, building upon a previous law that prohibited sales and transfers. The speaker, Jared from Guns and Gadgets, explains how Bill S359A, enacted last year, defined 'prohibited firearms' and banned their manufacture, sale, transfer, and purchase, while grandfathering existing owners. The new Bill H8073 escalates this by criminalizing possession, imposing severe penalties including up to 10 years in prison and $10,000 fines, and requiring forfeiture of firearms. This is presented as a 'forced dispossession scheme' and a test case for broader nationwide implementation, with legal challenges anticipated based on Second Amendment precedent like the Bruen decision and the common use doctrine.

This video from Washington Gun Law provides a critical analysis of Virginia's recent legislative session, detailing numerous bills that significantly impact firearm ownership and rights. Expert William Kirk breaks down specific legislation, including assault weapon bans, magazine capacity restrictions, and new liability standards for FFLs, highlighting the potential erosion of Second Amendment freedoms in the state. The content serves as a warning and a call to action for firearm owners in Virginia.

This video provides an expert legal analysis from Armed Scholar regarding recent court rulings on rifle and magazine bans. It details the significance of the D.C. court's decision in Benson v. United States striking down a magazine ban, its impact on a New Jersey case before the Third Circuit, and the potential for this to create a circuit split that compels Supreme Court review. The analysis highlights key legal arguments concerning common use and historical tradition under the Bruen framework.