Videos tagged with Fifth Amendment

This video analyzes Rhode Island's proposed bill H8073, which seeks to remove the grandfather clause from a previous assault weapons ban, making possession of previously legally owned firearms a felony. Speaker Colion Noir argues this demonstrates a pattern of incremental gun control, where initial compromises are later revoked. He highlights a state representative's statement that the ban was a 'partial step' and that the new bill 'finishes what we started,' suggesting the ultimate goal is total disarmament. The analysis also touches on legal arguments regarding 'police power' versus property confiscation under the Fifth Amendment.

This video discusses a proposed bill in Rhode Island (H8073) that aims to ban the possession of firearms already legally owned by residents. The bill, modeled after Canadian gun control measures, seeks to expand the state's existing assault weapons ban by prohibiting possession, not just future sales. The speaker argues this constitutes confiscation and violates Second Amendment rights, citing concerns about the Fifth Amendment's takings clause and the Supreme Court's Bruin decision, which requires historical tradition for gun regulations. The video highlights overwhelming public opposition during a committee hearing, though the bill remains alive for further study.

This video discusses Rhode Island House Bill 8073, which proposes to add 'possess' to the state's existing assault weapon ban. If passed, this would criminalize possession of previously legal firearms, with penalties up to 10 years in prison and a $10,000 fine. The bill mandates dispossessing prohibited firearms by December 31st, 2026, without compensation, raising concerns about Fifth and Second Amendment violations.

This video features legal experts William Kirk and Adam Kraut discussing significant legal challenges impacting Second Amendment rights. They analyze federal legislation like HR 1808 (assault weapons ban) and state laws such as Washington's I-1639, detailing FPC's litigation efforts against these measures. The discussion also covers ATF regulations, particularly concerning pistol braces, and the impact of court injunctions.

This video from Washington Gun Law, presented by William Kirk, analyzes proposed firearm legislation in Minnesota, specifically HF 3433 and SF 3654 (assault weapon ban) and HF 3402 and SF 3714 (magazine ban). It details the potential impacts, including registration requirements and restrictions on ownership, transfer, and inheritance, while assessing the likelihood of these bills passing. The analysis highlights potential constitutional challenges and advises viewers to support the Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus.

This video features TheYankeeMarshal, a high-level 2A commentator, critically examining the ATF's perceived authority to conduct warrantless door-to-door firearm confiscations. He highlights concerns that the Trump administration might engage in such practices and cites over 4,000 judicial judgments against the ATF for violating the 4th and 5th Amendments. The discussion is politically charged, focusing on potential threats to gun rights.

This "No FUD Zone" podcast episode features a panel discussion on various Second Amendment and firearms-related topics. The discussion includes a critical analysis of political administrations' impact on gun rights, a debate on the ethics and effectiveness of big game hunting, and advice on selecting a self-defense handgun for individuals with physical limitations. The panel also touches on firearm manufacturing origins and the nuances of gun ownership across the political spectrum.

This video analyzes a significant legal ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit concerning Donald Trump's anti-DEI executive orders. Mark W. Smith, a constitutional attorney, explains how the court found that the plaintiffs lacked standing to challenge the orders, leading to the vacation of a preliminary injunction. The discussion delves into the legal arguments surrounding the orders' intent to end perceived discriminatory practices in federal grants and contracts, touching upon constitutional clauses and judicial interpretations.

This video discusses the legal challenges to California's surveillance law for Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs) in the Richards v. Newsom case. It details how the law mandates 24-hour audio and visual recording by FFLs, with data accessible by the DOJ. The discussion focuses on the constitutional arguments, including violations of the First, Fourth, and Fifth Amendments, and the implications for FFLs and gun owners' privacy rights.

This video from Liberty Doll analyzes Utah Bill HB 133, which proposes criminalizing the failure to immediately report self-defense incidents involving force. The discussion highlights the importance of legal counsel, referencing a specific case that inspired the bill and explaining the implications of pretrial justification hearings. The speaker offers a critical perspective on the bill's necessity and advises minimal communication with law enforcement before consulting an attorney.

This video, presented by Scott from Line 45, details critical legal strategies for armed citizens interacting with law enforcement. It emphasizes the importance of clearly invoking the right to remain silent and the right to counsel to avoid self-incrimination, citing Supreme Court cases like Miranda v. Arizona and Selenus v. Texas. The guide also covers how to handle consent searches and the legal ramifications of brandishing a firearm.